Reason Bound

Award winning Birtish journalist Charles Thomson returns to Reason Bound to talk about the bane of their existence: unhinged fans. The term "celebrity worship" gets thrown around a lot, but it's very real and it causes very real cognitive issues. While there isn't an abundance of research on people who transition from fans to radical fanatics, Ryan and Charles discuss a study titled: "Cognitive Skills Revisited: Applying Cattell's Two-Factor Theory Of Intelligence In a Cross-Sectional Study". The results of the study demonstrate celebrity worship has a direct association with poor performance on cognitive tests that cannot be accounted for by demographic and socioeconomic factors. Charles and Ryan discuss fandom as a way to establish identity, the impact of fan behavior on the legacy of artists, and what types of toxic behavior fanatics engage in to ascend to positions of authority within particular fandoms. Of course, no episode with Charles would be complete without revisiting Michael Jackson and some of the extremes of his fanbase, including perhaps his most extreme fans of all: his detractors.

Astucious Aussie, Ben Holford, returns to Reason Bound to talk with Ryan about various controversies and how public attitudes have shaped the surrounding narratives. They discuss the concept of over-shaming having a backlash effect and if the level of "cancelling" makes others to be more or less likely inclined to apologize when they recognize they've offended someone in some way. Offense itself can be difficult to navigate as they discuss where lines of respect are reasonably drawn. What is the utility of digging up transgressions of years gone by if the person who transgressed doesn't even hold their antiquated attitudes present day? People and controversies discussed include Prince Harry, Lizzo, and CM Punk. This interview is an in depth discussion on all things related to bounds of reason, lines drawn for acceptable behavior, and ultimately achieving social cohesion.

Denise Johnson returns to Reason Bound to join Ryan for a discussion on what shapes our identities in relation to our politics and/or voting habits. Denise discusses the balancing act some immigrants to the U.S. face in trying to retain cultural aspects from their home country while assimilating into their new society. Even finding a place amongst people from the same cultural background can be difficult, as Denise shares why her family bestowed her with the title "lioness" due to her fighting conventional ideas of how she should act. Finally, Denise discusses an important book for her that she calls "a mentality shift" authored by Don Miguel Ruiz titled: "The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom". Denise and Ryan go in depth on each of the four agreements: Be impeccable with your word, do not take anything personally, do not make assumptions, and always do your best. They also discuss the famous Trolley Dilemma and utilitarian v.s. deontological judgements.

Abraham Holloman returns to Reason Bound to talk with Ryan about a documentary called "Crazy, Not Insane". The documentary features noted crime psychiatrist Dorothy Otnow Lewis examine aspects of the brain. Specifically, Dr. Lewis has spent years studying the psychology of murders with a focus on Dissociative Identity Disorder (formerly called Multiple Personality Disorder). In keeping with Reason Bound's attempt to find the "why" behind what motivates people, it was a great film to better understand the psychology of those affected by Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) and why they sometimes commit horrendous acts. Abraham and Ryan likewise found the film insightful to what Abraham calls the levity, light, and brightness of Dr. Lewis as she leads the audience through case study after case study. Despite disturbing subject matter, the film leaves the viewer feeling they have a foundational understanding of some of the factors that lead to a person becoming, though perhaps not crazy, clinically insane.

Mike Hubbard returns to Reason Bound to discuss how he views the relationship he has with his wife and the value it brings to their home. Mike prefers to be out making money and hustling on the side to provide financial support, while his wife prefers to stay at home and raise their children herself. Mike discusses his thoughts on the importance of both roles, the importance of both parties consenting and wanting the roles they have, and how in their case it has resulted in a happy, healthy, functioning home life. While acknowledging his partnership with his wife can't work for every couple, he does a great job of articulating why he and his wife have chosen their relationship, best described as tradition with a twist.