American Conservative University

No Dave, Islam Is the Problem Dave Smith’s take on Islam is going viral, and it’s just one of many that miss the mark. We break down the argument about Islam, violence, and global conflict, how media narratives shape public perception, the historical examples people keep pointing to, and why context, cause, and reaction actually matter. Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/xBezcRYCNWk?si=5jA6j4LuKljelqaQ StevenCrowder 5.85M subscribers 130,464 views Mar 17, 2026 Link to sources: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sou... Backyard Butchers - get 20% off your first box, plus an extra 10% off when you subscribe and become a Backyard Butchers member. Use PROMO CODE CROWDER when you order at http://BackyardButchers.com/crowder Foundation Daily is made up of premium ingredients to reduce inflammation and stress and promote clean energy and mental clarity. Subscribe now and receive 40% off for life. https://foundationdaily.com/ DOWNLOAD THE RUMBLE APP TODAY: https://rumble.com/our-apps Join Rumble Premium to watch this show every day! http://louderwithcrowder.com/Premium Bite-Sized Content: https://rumble.com/c/CrowderBits Subscribe to my podcast: https://feeds.libsyn.com/576250/rss FOLLOW ME: Website: https://louderwithcrowder.com/ X: https://x.com/scrowder Instagram:   / louderwithcrowder   Facebook:   / stevencrowderofficial  

Explicit. Something wild just happened. The Existential Danger of Iranian Nukes. An official has unexpectedly resigned, citing concerns over foreign policy and international pressures. The video breaks down the controversial statement and examines contradictory past actions. Viewers explore the complex geopolitical implications surrounding the situation. Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/XaJOk3DgYkg?si=bw9HFmwDvZAMP-4p Asmongold TV  4.47M subscribers 1,005,344 views Mar 17, 2026 Asmongold reacts to the Joe Kent situation. ► Asmongold's Twitch:   / zackrawrr   ► Asmongold's X: https://x.com/asmongold ► Asmongold's Kick: https://kick.com/asmongold ► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit:   / asmongold   ► Asmongold's Twitch VOD Rerun Channel:   / asmongold247   ► Asmongold's Kick VOD Rerun Channel: https://kick.com/asmongold247 Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of Asmongold If you own the copyright of content showed in this video and would like it to be removed: https://x.com/CatDanyRU https://x.com/DAsmongold

Dinesh D'Souza- IMPORTING JIHAD and a Great Clip from Liberal Hivemind- They Want You Dead.   Dinesh D'Souza- IMPORTING JIHAD. Liberal Hivemind- FINALLY, SOMEONE SAID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   IMPORTING JIHAD To watch the entire video visit-  https://youtu.be/g9ny8rCQuyI?si=mGjgvkNlbTYdVw4X Dinesh D'Souza 809K subscribers 5,582 views Premiered 16 hours ago The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast IMPORTING JIHAD Are sleeper cells about to be awoken in a neighborhood near you? This episode was sponsored and made possible by http://DineshGold.com. Get up to $10k in FREE silver when you let them know I sent you! Dinesh D'Souza is an author and filmmaker. A graduate of Dartmouth College, he was a senior domestic policy analyst in the Reagan administration. He also served as a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. He is the author of many bestselling books, including "Illiberal Education," "What's So Great About Christianity," "America: Imagine a World Without Her," "The Roots of Obama's Rage," "Death of a Nation," and "United States of Socialism." His documentary films "2016: Obama's America," "America," "Hillary's America," "Death of a Nation," and "Trump Card" are among the highest-grossing political documentaries of all time. He and his wife Debbie are also executive producers of the acclaimed feature film "Infidel." — Want to connect with Dinesh D'Souza online for more hard-hitting analysis of current events in America? Here’s how: Get Dinesh unfiltered, uncensored and unchained on Locals: https://dinesh.locals.com/ Facebook:   / dsouzadinesh   Twitter:   / dineshdsouza   Rumble: https://rumble.com/dineshdsouza Instagram:   / dineshjdsouza   Parler: https://parler.com/user/DineshDSouza GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/dineshdsouza Email: https://dineshdsouza.com/contact-us/   FINALLY, SOMEONE SAID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/9VAcwGKdREA?si=cdvfxWwE9dKL9iaH Liberal Hivemind 1.74M subscribers 161,888 views Mar 16, 2026 JOIN US AT: https://www.5mind.com !!! FOLLOW ON X: https://x.com/5MINDX Let's build a FREE SPEECH social media platform TOGETHER!!!!

Part 1 of 2. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution.  The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution The Constitution of the United States created a representative republic marked by federalism and the separation of powers. Yet numerous federal judges--led by the Supreme Court--have used the Constitution as a blank check to substitute their own views on hot-button issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and samesex marriage for perfectly constitutional laws enacted by We the People through our elected representatives. Now, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution shows that there is very little relationship between the Constitution as ratified by the thirteen original states more than two centuries ago and the "constitutional law" imposed upon us since then. Instead of the system of state-level decision makers and elected officials the Constitution was intended to create, judges have given us a highly centralized system in which bureaucrats and appointed--not elected--officials make most of the important policies. In The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution, Professor Kevin Gutzman explains how the Constitution:  Was understood by the founders who wrote it and the people who ratified it. Follows the Supreme Court as it uses the fig leaf of the Constitution to cover its naked usurpation of the rights and powers the Constitution explicitly reserves to the states and to the people. Slid from the Constitution's republican federal government, with its very limited powers, to an unrepublican "judgeocracy" with limitless powers. How the Fourteenth Amendment has been twisted to use the Bill of Rights as a check on state power instead of on federal power, as originally intended. The radical inconsistency between "constitutional law" and the rule of law. Contends that the judges who receive the most attention in history books are celebrated for acting against the Constitution rather than for it.   As Professor Gutzman shows, constitutional law is supposed to apply the Constitution's plain meaning to prevent judges, presidents, and congresses from overstepping their authority. If we want to return to the founding fathers' vision of the Republic, if we want the Constitution enforced in the way it was explained to the people at the time of its ratification, then we have to overcome the "received wisdom" about what constitutional law is. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution is an important step in that direction.

Part 2 of 2. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution The Constitution of the United States created a representative republic marked by federalism and the separation of powers. Yet numerous federal judges--led by the Supreme Court--have used the Constitution as a blank check to substitute their own views on hot-button issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and samesex marriage for perfectly constitutional laws enacted by We the People through our elected representatives. Now, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution shows that there is very little relationship between the Constitution as ratified by the thirteen original states more than two centuries ago and the "constitutional law" imposed upon us since then. Instead of the system of state-level decision makers and elected officials the Constitution was intended to create, judges have given us a highly centralized system in which bureaucrats and appointed--not elected--officials make most of the important policies. In The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution, Professor Kevin Gutzman explains how the Constitution:  Was understood by the founders who wrote it and the people who ratified it. Follows the Supreme Court as it uses the fig leaf of the Constitution to cover its naked usurpation of the rights and powers the Constitution explicitly reserves to the states and to the people. Slid from the Constitution's republican federal government, with its very limited powers, to an unrepublican "judgeocracy" with limitless powers. How the Fourteenth Amendment has been twisted to use the Bill of Rights as a check on state power instead of on federal power, as originally intended. The radical inconsistency between "constitutional law" and the rule of law. Contends that the judges who receive the most attention in history books are celebrated for acting against the Constitution rather than for it.   As Professor Gutzman shows, constitutional law is supposed to apply the Constitution's plain meaning to prevent judges, presidents, and congresses from overstepping their authority. If we want to return to the founding fathers' vision of the Republic, if we want the Constitution enforced in the way it was explained to the people at the time of its ratification, then we have to overcome the "received wisdom" about what constitutional law is. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution is an important step in that direction.