<description>&lt;p&gt;A psychologist, was accused of misconduct having retweeted and commented on social media posts which were critical of or disagreed with the Government&amp;apos;s approach the Covid-19 pandemic. In light of this case, Daniel Berke and Mark Harries KC examine when a regulator may go too far in trying to limit the exercise of free speech and beliefs, and when it is appropriate to intervene.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

PLOD - Police Law On Demand

PLOD - Police Law On Demand

S7E3: Sharing opinions – when is it wrong for a regulator to interfere with an individual's right to express their opinions and beliefs?

OCT 30, 202341 MIN
PLOD - Police Law On Demand

S7E3: Sharing opinions – when is it wrong for a regulator to interfere with an individual's right to express their opinions and beliefs?

OCT 30, 202341 MIN

Description

A psychologist, was accused of misconduct having retweeted and commented on social media posts which were critical of or disagreed with the Government's approach the Covid-19 pandemic. In light of this case, Daniel Berke and Mark Harries KC examine when a regulator may go too far in trying to limit the exercise of free speech and beliefs, and when it is appropriate to intervene.