Politix

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.politix.fm?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.politix.fm</a><br/><br/><p>Donald Trump hasn’t been this unpopular since he incited an insurrection. But he’s still at least a bit more popular than an entity called The Democratic Party.</p><p>In this episode Matt and Brian discuss:</p><p>* Do Democrats deserve <em>any </em>credit for Donald Trump’s political woes?</p><p>* How should we square Democrats’ impressive performance in special and off-year elections with their underwhelming performance in the generic ballot?</p><p>* If Democrats change nothing between now and November, would they win big by default, or disappoint, leaving everyone wishing they’d undertaken a more serious rebranding?</p><p>Then, since nobody disagrees that Democrats have become toxically unpopular, we get at why? To what extent is it contemporaneous frustration with the weakness of the Democratic opposition, and to what extent is a longer-run disaffection with a party that’s moved left over the past couple decades. Have Democrats <em>really </em>changed stripes? Or are they right where they “should” be, given long-run liberal commitments to a robust welfare state and civil equality?</p><p>All that, plus the full <em>Politix</em> archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.</p><p>Further reading:</p><p>* Brian argues Dems <a target="_blank" href="https://www.offmessage.net/p/how-to-fix-democrats-generic-ballot">don’t necessarily need to sweat their generic ballot woes, but can only fix them by picking more fights with Donald Trump</a>.</p><p>* Matt thinks <a target="_blank" href="https://www.slowboring.com/p/shifting-left">Democrats’ uniform moves to the left since 2008-2012 are the culprit</a>.</p><p>* Ta-Nehisi Coates <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thebulwark.com/p/ta-nehisi-coates-this-is-armed-identity">on the counterproductive aspects of intersectional political rhetoric</a>: “If you can extend the the temporality out just a little bit of the struggle I think it makes the mistakes not better, but understandable. It’s very, very hard to get any movement of humans to always act right, speak right, talk right. I really, really wish people read more about the civil rights movement deeply because they were fucking up all the time.”</p>

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.politix.fm?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.politix.fm</a><br/><br/><p>Donald Trump seems to want out of the Iran war AND out of the Department of Homeland Security shutdown. But only if he can get out by being an even bigger asshole. </p><p>In this Matt and Brian discuss:</p><p>* Trump’s latest, inscrutable, and quite likely corrupt machinations to end his war of choice (or at least prosecute the war without throttling global oil supply);</p><p>* Signs that Republicans are catching more heat than Democrats for the DHS shutdown (and the ensuing long lines at airports);</p><p>* Whether it was wise or unnecessarily risk averse for Democrats to offer to fund TSA and other non-immigration components of DHS (to avoid blowback from weary travelers).</p><p>Then, does the fact that Democrats have maintained unity in this fight for the past 40 days redeem Chuck Schumer at all? (No.) If not, does it suggest that the Senate Democrats who lost confidence in him aren’t really that interested in fighting after all? Will this kind of fighting help Democrats improve their abysmal approval numbers and lagging generic-ballot numbers? Or are they simply unpopular because they’re out of step, policy-wise, with the electorate?</p><p>All that, plus the full <em>Politix</em> archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.</p><p>Further reading:</p><p>* Brian argues that the real problem with Democrats’ policy agenda isn’t that it’s too far left, per se, but that <a target="_blank" href="http://the Department of Homeland Security, which has been shut down for about 40 days.">it will, once again, crowd out the more pressing matters of democracy protection and accountability for fascism</a>.</p><p>* Matt on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.slowboring.com/p/why-hasnt-oil-gotten-even-more-expensive">the most perverse reason Trump hasn’t quite chickened out of the war</a>.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://x.com/ryanburge/status/2035382038199447817">Perception of partisan ideology, by party ID</a>. </p>

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.politix.fm?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.politix.fm</a><br/><br/><p>Democrats are caught in a new and somewhat troubling fad, in which they promise working-class people extremely broad tax cuts, which, in practice, would make expanding the safety net all but impossible.</p><p>In this Matt and Brian discuss:</p><p>* The Oscars!</p><p>* What <em>are </em>these policies, where do they come from, and what would they mean, in practice, for other elements of the Democratic agenda?</p><p>* Is there tension between Revenuemaxxing™️ and Billionairemogging™️, and can it be resolved?</p><p>* Given all that will need to be rebuilt post-Trump, should Democrats embrace fiscal responsibility, or might there be some advantage to playing chicken with Republicans over the future of the American welfare state?</p><p>Then, Donald Trump seems pretty panicked about the consequences of his misbegotten Iran war. But not enough to chicken out. At least not yet. Why is that? What are the peculiarities of the global energy market that might explain it. If he’s waiting for global oil futures to hit crisis levels, what kinds of developments in the war might send it there? And can we count on Democrats to oppose war funding?</p><p>All that, plus the full <em>Politix</em> archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.</p><p>Further reading:</p><p>* Matt on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.slowboring.com/p/nobody-plans-for-a-quagmire">quagmires</a>. </p><p>* Brian on how the Iran war <a target="_blank" href="https://www.offmessage.net/p/elites-maga-trump-iran">exposes the shallowness of the U.S. elite</a>.</p><p>* The Yale Budget Lab on <a target="_blank" href="https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/senator-van-hollens-working-americans-tax-cut-act">the Van Hollen tax plan</a>.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://heatmap.news/energy/iran-oil-strategic-reserve">Matt Zeitlen on the oil shock</a>. (Spoiler: it’s bad.)</p>

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.politix.fm?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.politix.fm</a><br/><br/><p>Depending on whether you believe Donald Trump, or Donald Trump, or Donald Trump, his war in Iran is “very complete” or “just beginning” or “both.”</p><p>In this Matt and Brian discuss:</p><p>* Has Trump finally set in motion a disaster he can’t contain?</p><p>* What does TACO <em>mean</em> when others have a say over the disposition of events?</p><p>* Are we doomed to reprisal attacks and a long-lasting energy crisis?</p><p>Then, what the hell is Jared Polis thinking?! The governor of Colorado is apparently planning to commute the sentence of Tina Peters, a former election official who tried to help Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election. Should Polis’s partisan and ideological allies try to stop him? How? Is he acting purely in response to Trump’s threat of reprisals? And to the extent he really thinks it’s a good idea, what are his obligations as a retiring elected official serving at a time when liberal democracy is under severe threat?</p><p>All that, plus the full <em>Politix</em> archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.</p><p>Further reading:</p><p>* Brian asks <a target="_blank" href="https://www.offmessage.net/p/elites-maga-trump-iran">why elites seem just as easily duped as MAGA nobodies</a>. </p><p>* Matt’s prescient piece on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/4/25/15419740/obama-speaking-fee">the moral failure of liberal leaders to not act selfishly</a>.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.offmessage.net/p/impeach-jared-polis">Should Colorado Democrats impeach Jared Polis</a>?</p>

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.politix.fm?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.politix.fm</a><br/><br/><p>We’re at war with Iran all of a sudden, and nobody can say why, even the people who started the war. After closing the loop on the Texas Senate primary, Matt and Brian discuss:</p><p>* What was Donald Trump thinking? </p><p>* What consequences (regional, domestic, and global) should we be prepared for?</p><p>* What do we make of the Democratic response so far?</p><p>Then, because the war has no support and was not justified, the public is overwhelmingly opposed to it. This should tend to fracture Republicans and unite Democrats. But it raises some questions: Will the progressives who couldn’t bring themselves to admit that Kamala Harris was the more anti-war of the two candidates in 2024 link arms with Democrats? Will the Trump supporters (GOP propagandists, marginal voters) who claimed to support Trump on anti-war grounds change their thinking? How much intra-GOP strife is driven by antisemitism? And what’s the best way to make sense of the mixed messages and buck passing already leaking out of the administration?</p><p>All that, plus the full <em>Politix</em> archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed.</p><p>Further reading:</p><p>* Matt on <a target="_blank" href="https://www.slowboring.com/p/the-anti-antisemitism-movement-is">the failure of the anti-antisemitism movement</a>. </p><p>* Brian argues <a target="_blank" href="https://www.offmessage.net/p/republicans-wage-war-as-politics">Trump uses war abroad as an instrument of domestic politics, which he in turn views as civil war by other means</a>.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politix.fm/p/all-tapped-out">Our initial views</a> on the state of the Talarico v. Crockett Senate primary.</p>