In this episode we talk about Max Horkheimer’s essay “Traditional and Critical Theory”, which serves as a kind of manifesto for the Frankfurt School of Marxist thought. We talk about how he defines these categories, reflect on whether the distinction holds up, and ask ourselves whether we can call ourselves critical theorists in the present. It turns out grasping oneself as part of a historically unfolding social totality is difficult, if you can believe it. Special thanks to our friends at the Critical Theory Working Group, who you should check out:<a href='https://ctwgwebsite.github.io/'>https://ctwgwebsite.github.io/</a><a href='https://jamescrane.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&amp;utm_medium=web'>https://jamescrane.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&amp;utm_medium=web</a><a href='http://leftofphilosophy.com'>leftofphilosophy.com</a> | @leftofphil | @leftofphilosophy.bsky.social References:Max Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays, trans. Matthew J. O’Connell and others (New York: Continuum, 2002).Music:“Vintage Memories” by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com“My Space” by Overu |<a href='https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN'> https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN</a>

<description>&lt;p&gt;In this episode we talk about Max Horkheimer’s essay “Traditional and Critical Theory”, which serves as a kind of manifesto for the Frankfurt School of Marxist thought. We talk about how he defines these categories, reflect on whether the distinction holds up, and ask ourselves whether we can call ourselves critical theorists in the present. It turns out grasping oneself as part of a historically unfolding social totality is difficult, if you can believe it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special thanks to our friends at the Critical Theory Working Group, who you should check out:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='https://ctwgwebsite.github.io/'&gt;https://ctwgwebsite.github.io/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='https://jamescrane.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&amp;amp;utm_medium=web'&gt;https://jamescrane.substack.com?utm_source=navbar&amp;amp;utm_medium=web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://leftofphilosophy.com'&gt;leftofphilosophy.com&lt;/a&gt; | @leftofphil | @leftofphilosophy.bsky.social &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;References:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Max Horkheimer, &lt;em&gt;Critical Theory: Selected Essays&lt;/em&gt;, trans. Matthew J. O’Connell and others (New York: Continuum, 2002).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Music:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Vintage Memories” by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“My Space” by Overu |&lt;a href='https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN'&gt; https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>

In this episode we talk about Max Horkheimer’s essay “Traditional and Critical Theory”, which serves as a kind of manifesto for the Frankfurt School of Marxist thought. We talk about how he defines these categories, reflect on whether the distinction holds up, and ask ourselves whether we can call ourselves critical theorists in the present. It turns out grasping oneself as part of a historically unfolding social totality is difficult, if you can believe it.  Special thanks to our friend...

What's Left of Philosophy

130 | Max Horkheimer: What Makes Critical Theory Critical?

130 | Max Horkheimer: What Makes Critical Theory Critical?

Description