<p>You and your daughter hear a pro-choice argument that catches you off guard: if a building were on fire and you could only save the newborns in the nursery or the frozen embryos in the freezer, everyone would save the newborns, so embryos must not be as valuable. How do you respond?</p><p>In this episode, Elizabeth Urbanowicz uses that exact argument to teach a simple, repeatable way to evaluate any objection that gives you pause. You&#39;ll learn how to:</p><ol><li>Pin down what an argument is really claiming, premise by premise.</li><li>Pressure-test each premise to see whether it actually holds up.</li><li>Respond wisely, with disarming questions that open a real conversation instead of a debate.</li></ol><p>You&#39;ll also hear why the gut instinct that an embryo is &quot;less human&quot; than a born baby falls apart under examination, and how a single well-placed question can expose the hidden flaw in the burning-building scenario. It is a conversation that will sharpen your own thinking and give you the tools to train your children to do the same.</p><p>Resources mentioned: <a href="https://foundationworldview.com/book/what-is-truth" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">What Is Truth?</a> (a picture book for ages 4 to 7) and the <a href="https://foundationworldview.com/curriculum/careful-thinking-family-pricing" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">Careful Thinking curriculum</a> (ages 10 and up), both available at foundationworldview.com.</p><p>Have a question you would like answered on a future episode? Submit it at <a href="https://foundationworldview.com/podcast" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">foundationworldview.com/podcast</a>.</p>