<description>&lt;p&gt;On the last day of the 2024-25, the Supreme Court issued its decision in &lt;em&gt;Trump v. CASA&lt;/em&gt;, involving the validity of universal injunctions.  By a 6-3 vote, the Court granted the Trump administration’s request to limit the availability of such injunctions in a case in which the plaintiffs challenged the legality of President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship.  &lt;em&gt;CASA&lt;/em&gt; may seem like a somewhattechnical case about equitable remedies, but in fact &lt;em&gt;CASA&lt;/em&gt; tells us a great deal about the current Supreme Court, especially regarding its views on presidential power and separation of powers in a time of political and legal transition.  Jessica Silbey, Associate Dean and Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law, discusses &lt;em&gt;CASA&lt;/em&gt;with Associate Dean Rodger Citron on this Touro Law Review podcast. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>

On the last day of the 2024-25, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Trump v. CASA, involving the validity of universal injunctions.  By a 6-3 vote, the Court granted the Trump administration’s request to limit the availability of such injunctions in a case in which the plaintiffs challenged the legality of President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship.  CASA may seem like a somewhattechnical case about equitable remedies, but in fact CASA tells us a great deal about the current Supreme Court, especially regarding its views on presidential power and separation of powers in a time of political and legal transition.  Jessica Silbey, Associate Dean and Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law, discusses CASAwith Associate Dean Rodger Citron on this Touro Law Review podcast.

Touro Law Review Podcast

Trump v. CASA: The Case of Universal Injunctions

Trump v. CASA: The Case of Universal Injunctions

Description