In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well.
 
Shownotes
<ul>
<li>Paul Graham. (2008). <a href='https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html'>How to disagree</a>. </li>
<li><a href='https://bigthink.com/the-learning-curve/rapoports-rules-arguments/'>Rapoport's Rules</a>. 
<ul>
<li>Cass Sunstien. <a href='https://casssunstein.substack.com/p/the-rapoport-rules'>The Rapoport Rules.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href='https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336955019_Preregistration_is_redundant_at_best'>Preregistration is redundant, at best. </a></li>
<li><a href='https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf'>An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review </a></li>
<li>

Fiedler, K., Messner, C., &amp; Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. <a href='https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248'>https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248</a>

</li>
<li>

Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.

</li>
</ul>

<description>&lt;p&gt;In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shownotes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Paul Graham. (2008). &lt;a href='https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html'&gt;How to disagree&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href='https://bigthink.com/the-learning-curve/rapoports-rules-arguments/'&gt;Rapoport's Rules&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cass Sunstien. &lt;a href='https://casssunstein.substack.com/p/the-rapoport-rules'&gt;The Rapoport Rules.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href='https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336955019_Preregistration_is_redundant_at_best'&gt;Preregistration is redundant, at best. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href='https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf'&gt;An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;

Fiedler, K., Messner, C., &amp;amp; Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. &lt;a href='https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248'&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;

Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.

&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>

In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well.
 
Shownotes

Paul Graham. (2008). How to disagree. 
Rapoport's Rules. 

Cass Sunstien. The Rapoport Rules.


Preregistration is redundant, at best. 
An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review 


Fiedler, K., Messner, C., &amp; Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248




Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.



 

Nullius in Verba

Episode 79: Dissensio - II

Episode 79: Dissensio - II

Description