Why is it that we can tell someone “I’m totally fine!” and they instantly know we’re not? Gestures, facial expressions, tone of voice, and other subtle nonverbal cues play a huge role in how we connect with one another.  In this episode, host Charles Duhigg explores how we communicate without words, including a deep dive into the visual and tonal cues embedded in one of the biggest sitcoms of all time, The Big Bang Theory.  He talks with Dr. Dustin York, a professor at Maryville University who studies nonverbal communication and worked in public relations for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. He also sits down with Dave Goetsch, a co-executive producer and longtime writer for The Big Bang Theory, and journalist Jessica Radloff, who wrote <a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/jessica-radloff/the-big-bang-theory/9781538708491/?lens=grand-central-publishing">an exhaustive book about the show</a>.  This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired byDuhigg’s bestselling book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Supercommunicators-Unlock-Secret-Language-Connection/dp/0593243919">Supercommunicators</a>.  Supercommunicators was produced by Sophie Summergrad and Derek John, who also did the sound design. Our technical director is Merritt Jacob and our supervising producer is Joel Meyer. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a>

<description>Why is it that we can tell someone “I’m totally fine!” and they instantly know we’re not? Gestures, facial expressions, tone of voice, and other subtle nonverbal cues play a huge role in how we connect with one another. 

In this episode, host Charles Duhigg explores how we communicate without words, including a deep dive into the visual and tonal cues embedded in one of the biggest sitcoms of all time, The Big Bang Theory. 

He talks with Dr. Dustin York, a professor at Maryville University who studies nonverbal communication and worked in public relations for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. He also sits down with Dave Goetsch, a co-executive producer and longtime writer for The Big Bang Theory, and journalist Jessica Radloff, who wrote an exhaustive book about the show. 

This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired by
Duhigg’s bestselling book, Supercommunicators. 

Supercommunicators was produced by Sophie Summergrad and Derek John, who also did the sound design. Our technical director is Merritt Jacob and our supervising producer is Joel Meyer.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices</description>

What we can learn about nonverbal cues from The Big Bang Theory.

Why is it that we can tell someone “I’m totally fine!” and they instantly know we’re not? Gestures, facial expressions, tone of voice, and other subtle nonverbal cues play a huge role in how we connect with one another. 

In this episode, host Charles Duhigg explores how we communicate without words, including a deep dive into the visual and tonal cues embedded in one of the biggest sitcoms of all time, The Big Bang Theory. 

He talks with Dr. Dustin York, a professor at Maryville University who studies nonverbal communication and worked in public relations for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. He also sits down with Dave Goetsch, a co-executive producer and longtime writer for The Big Bang Theory, and journalist Jessica Radloff, who wrote an exhaustive book about the show. 

This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired by
Duhigg’s bestselling book, Supercommunicators. 

Supercommunicators was produced by Sophie Summergrad and Derek John, who also did the sound design. Our technical director is Merritt Jacob and our supervising producer is Joel Meyer.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Supercommunicators | 2. How to Communicate Without Words

Why are some people able to talk with just about anyone—about almost anything? One answer may lie in the questions we ask—and how deeply we ask them. Stick with us here… In this episode, host Charles Duhigg examines why deep questions are so powerful and how to ask them in everyday life. He talks to Nick Epley, psychology professor at the University of Chicago and lifelong researcher of deep questions. And we catch up with Mandy Len Catron, 10 years after she wrote the viral New York Times article “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/09/style/no-37-big-wedding-or-small.html">The 36 Questions That Lead to Love</a>.” This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired by Duhigg’s bestselling book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Supercommunicators-Unlock-Secret-Language-Connection/dp/0593243919">Supercommunicators</a>.  Supercommunicators was produced by Derek John and Sophie Summergrad.  Our technical director is Merritt Jacob.  Joel Meyer is our supervising producer. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a>

<description>Why are some people able to talk with just about anyone—about almost anything? One answer may lie in the questions we ask—and how deeply we ask them. Stick with us here…

In this episode, host Charles Duhigg examines why deep questions are so powerful and how to ask them in everyday life.

He talks to Nick Epley, psychology professor at the University of Chicago and lifelong researcher of deep questions. And we catch up with Mandy Len Catron, 10 years after she wrote the viral New York Times article “The 36 Questions That Lead to Love.”

This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired by Duhigg’s bestselling book, Supercommunicators. 

Supercommunicators was produced by Derek John and Sophie Summergrad. 

Our technical director is Merritt Jacob. 

Joel Meyer is our supervising producer.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices</description>

The art and practice of asking the right questions.

Why are some people able to talk with just about anyone—about almost anything? One answer may lie in the questions we ask—and how deeply we ask them. Stick with us here…

In this episode, host Charles Duhigg examines why deep questions are so powerful and how to ask them in everyday life.

He talks to Nick Epley, psychology professor at the University of Chicago and lifelong researcher of deep questions. And we catch up with Mandy Len Catron, 10 years after she wrote the viral New York Times article “The 36 Questions That Lead to Love.”

This Slate miniseries dives into the art and science of meaningful conversations, inspired by Duhigg’s bestselling book, Supercommunicators. 

Supercommunicators was produced by Derek John and Sophie Summergrad. 

Our technical director is Merritt Jacob. 

Joel Meyer is our supervising producer.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Supercommunicators | 1. How to Talk to Anyone

<description>&lt;p&gt;On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: a fond farewell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the last episode of Hear Me Out. And it comes at a volatile, strange time in the world of podcasting. Networks’ priorities have shifted, the money has shifted, and “success” means different things to different people. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nick Hilton of &lt;a href="https://www.podotpods.com/team"&gt;Podot&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://futureproofnews.substack.com/"&gt;Future Proof&lt;/a&gt; joins us for a discussion about the future of podcasting… whether we’re in it or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Hear Me Out team is grateful, endlessly, to every single listener who’s sent us a note. We’re not sure how long the address will work, but if the show mattered to you, we’d love to read your emails: &lt;a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com"&gt;hearmeout@slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Podcast production by &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/maurafcurrie"&gt;Maura Currie&lt;/a&gt;, who owes many more things than this podcast to &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/celesteheadlee"&gt;Celeste Headlee&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

At least, podcasting as we knew it.

On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: a fond farewell. This is the last episode of Hear Me Out. And it comes at a volatile, strange time in the world of podcasting. Networks’ priorities have shifted, the money has shifted, and “success” means different things to different people.  Nick Hilton of <a href="https://www.podotpods.com/team">Podot</a> and <a href="https://futureproofnews.substack.com/">Future Proof</a> joins us for a discussion about the future of podcasting… whether we’re in it or not. The Hear Me Out team is grateful, endlessly, to every single listener who’s sent us a note. We’re not sure how long the address will work, but if the show mattered to you, we’d love to read your emails: <a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com">hearmeout@slate.com</a> Podcast production by <a href="https://twitter.com/maurafcurrie">Maura Currie</a>, who owes many more things than this podcast to <a href="https://twitter.com/celesteheadlee">Celeste Headlee</a>. <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Podcasting Is Dead

<description>&lt;p&gt;On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What’s the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it’s meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what’s next?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, &lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/How-Pardon-Power-Works_and-Why/dp/1954907508"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pardon Power&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: &lt;a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com"&gt;hearmeout@slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Podcast production by Maura Currie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit &lt;a href="http://slate.com/awordplus"&gt;slate.com/hearmeoutplus&lt;/a&gt; to get access wherever you listen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

But yes, they’re a force for good, too.

On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What’s the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it’s meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what’s next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/How-Pardon-Power-Works_and-Why/dp/1954907508">Pardon Power</a>. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: <a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com">hearmeout@slate.com</a> Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit <a href="http://slate.com/awordplus">slate.com/hearmeoutplus</a> to get access wherever you listen. <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Presidential Pardons Need Reform

<description>&lt;p&gt;On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: &lt;a href="https://votesocialist2024.com/about-the-psl"&gt;PSL&lt;/a&gt; (not the drink).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@votesocialist2024?lang=en"&gt;Claudia de la Cruz&lt;/a&gt; cannot, mathematically, win the presidency. But she’s running anyway… because the two-party system doesn’t lend itself to real representation or the public interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Claudia joins us to make the case for voting socialist, because the parties with all the power aren’t as different as they want you to think.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;We’ll also share an important update about the future of Hear Me Out at the end of the episode. After that, please feel free to email the show: &lt;a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com"&gt;hearmeout@slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Podcast production by Maura Currie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit &lt;a href="http://slate.com/awordplus"&gt;slate.com/hearmeoutplus&lt;/a&gt; to get access wherever you listen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

There’s the billionaire class, and then there’s the rest of us.

On today’s episode of Hear Me Out: <a href="https://votesocialist2024.com/about-the-psl">PSL</a> (not the drink). <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@votesocialist2024?lang=en">Claudia de la Cruz</a> cannot, mathematically, win the presidency. But she’s running anyway… because the two-party system doesn’t lend itself to real representation or the public interest. Claudia joins us to make the case for voting socialist, because the parties with all the power aren’t as different as they want you to think. We’ll also share an important update about the future of Hear Me Out at the end of the episode. After that, please feel free to email the show: <a href="mailto:hearmeout@slate.com">hearmeout@slate.com</a> Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit <a href="http://slate.com/awordplus">slate.com/hearmeoutplus</a> to get access wherever you listen. <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

There’s No Lesser-Evil Candidate

Hear Me Out is Slate's destination for tough, topical discussions with integrity, and without cliches. Join host Celeste Headlee and a guest each week for a smart, fair debate on issues that matter.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Hear Me Out

Details

Recent Episodes