<div> <p>A confrontation at a high school track meet. A knife pulled in seconds. One teenager dead, another claiming he acted in self-defense.</p><p>On April 2, 2025, 17-year-old Austin Metcalf was fatally stabbed during a dispute at a track meet in Frisco, Texas. Witnesses described a brief confrontation between Metcalf and fellow student Karmelo Anthony before the encounter turned deadly.</p><p>What followed was a case that quickly became one of the most debated stories in the country. Supporters argued Anthony acted in self-defense after being confronted and feared for his safety. Others pointed to witness testimony and the circumstances surrounding the stabbing, arguing the evidence told a very different story.</p><p>In this episode of 13th Juror, we examine the events leading up to the fatal encounter, the investigation, the evidence presented at trial, the self-defense claim, and the arguments made by both sides. We also explore the public reaction, the misinformation that spread online, and the jury's decision that ultimately determined Anthony's fate.</p><p>How do jurors evaluate a self-defense claim? And when does a perceived threat justify the use of deadly force?</p><p>As always, we leave that decision where it belongs—with the jury.</p><p>🎧 Follow 13th Juror Podcast on your favorite podcast platform so you never miss an episode.<br>⭐ If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating and review.<br>📱 Follow Brandi Churchwell and 13th Juror Podcast on social media for case updates, behind-the-scenes content, and upcoming episode announcements.</p></div>