<p>When it comes to the issue of abortion, politicians tend to lose their collective minds by attempting to personalize objective moral facts as if they were choosing a favorite flavor of ice cream. Scott Klusendorf analyzes the strategic blunder of using &quot;personally pro-life&quot; language, a tactic that gives away the farm by shifting the debate from an objective truth claim to a mere subjective preference. Learn why moral claims must remain grounded in objective reality rather than personal sentiments on this episode of The Case for Life.</p><p><br></p><p>Be sure to subscribe to The Case for Life Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, or your favorite podcast app so you never miss a single episode.</p><p><br></p><p>Follow Scott Klusendorf on Rumble, Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter to be kept up to date on everything God is doing through my pro-life work.</p><p><br></p><p>Sign up for Pro-Life 101: 7 Days to Confident Engagement: https://scottklusendorf.com/prolife101/</p><p><br></p><p>Book me for an event or partner with Life Training Institute as a donor at https://prolifetraining.com.</p>