76. Why Science Always Carries Human Values with Anjan Chakravartty

MAY 17, 202640 MIN
Humanism Now | Secular Ethics, Curiosity and Compassionate Change

76. Why Science Always Carries Human Values with Anjan Chakravartty

MAY 17, 202640 MIN

Description

Support Humanism Now and Join Our Community! "Dogmatism is the enemy of reason, after all."Dr Anjan Chakravartty is the Apignani Foundation Chair for the Study of Atheism, Humanism, and Secular Ethics at the University of Miami and a philosopher of science whose work explores the nature of knowledge and what science tells us about the world. His latest edited volume, Science and Humanism: Knowledge, Values, and the Common Good, brings together leading philosophers to examine the relationship between science and humanist values — historically deep and increasingly urgent.Topics we cover✔︎ Why science is not a value-neutral tool — and why humanists need to think more carefully about what science is actually for ✔︎ How disinformation campaigns exploit the language of science to manufacture doubt on climate, health, and more ✔︎ What a genuinely humanistic science looks like in practice — from diversifying research communities to confronting scientismConnect with Dr Chakravartty and find out moreUniversity of Miami profile: https://people.miami.edu/profile/[email protected] and Humanism: Knowledge, Values, and the Common Good: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/science-and-humanism/Personal Website: https://anjanchakravartty.com/Send us Fan MailSupport the showSupport Humanism Now & Join Our Community!Follow @HumanismNowPod | YouTube | TikTok | Instagram | Facebook | Threads | X.com | BlueSkyHumanism Now is produced by Humanise Live a podcast production agency based in London, serving charities, companies, and individuals across the globe.Contact us to get starting in podcasting today at humanise.live or [email protected]: Blossom by Light PrismPodcast transcripts are AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided to make our content more accessible, but should not be considered a fully accurate record of the conversation.