<p><strong>Crime Bit with Danelle Hallan</strong> continues with Part 2 of the <strong>Sandra and Jim Melgar</strong> case, as the focus shifts from the chaotic crime scene to a trial built almost entirely on circumstantial evidence. Despite missing forensic links, mishandled leads, and unidentified DNA throughout the house, prosecutors push the theory that Sandra staged a home invasion to murder her husband.</p><p>What happens when a jury must choose between a “ridiculous” story and a broken investigation?</p><p>In Part 2, <strong>Danelle</strong> unpacks the courtroom battle, the controversial conviction, and the new DNA testing that could decide whether <strong>Sandra</strong> is a cold-blooded killer or the victim of a wrongful conviction. </p>