Trust Revolution
Trust Revolution

Trust Revolution

Shawn Yeager

Overview
Episodes

Details

Unfiltered conversations with builders, thinkers, and operators in Bitcoin and beyond. Exploring the systems we trust, why they work (or don't), and what comes next.

Recent Episodes

S02E16 Pippellia – Reputation Without a Kill Switch
DEC 18, 2025
S02E16 Pippellia – Reputation Without a Kill Switch
<p>“Web of Trust is any network of relationship where trust is distributed and emergent—it's not imposed by someone else.” Pip builds the infrastructure that makes decentralized reputation actually work. While platforms like Twitter sell verification for $8, he's applying Google's PageRank algorithm to Nostr—and giving it away for free.</p> <p><strong>EPISODE SUMMARY</strong></p> <p>Right now, if you want to know whether an account is real or a bot, you're trusting Twitter or Meta to tell you. That model is failing—platforms can't stop spam, won't stop scams that pay for ads, and increasingly demand full KYC just to participate. Pip is building the alternative: Vertex, a Web of Trust service that computes reputation scores across Nostr's social graph. Instead of a company database deciding who you are, your reputation emerges from the people who actually know you. The technology uses PageRank-style algorithms to surface trustworthy accounts and filter out impersonators—without any central authority making those calls. For builders, this means spam protection and personalized recommendations without reinventing the wheel. For individuals, it means your identity and audience become portable—no platform can erase you because no platform owns you. Pip made Vertex free because Nostr needs adoption more than he needs revenue, a bet that infrastructure must reach critical mass before it can sustain itself.</p> <p><strong>ABOUT THE GUEST</strong></p> <p>Pip (Pippellia) is the co-founder of Vertex, a Web of Trust service for Nostr developers. He builds the infrastructure layer that helps decentralized apps solve their hardest problem: figuring out who to trust when there's no central authority. Vertex uses PageRank-style algorithms to compute reputation scores, enabling spam filtering, personalized recommendations, and impersonation protection. He received an OpenSats grant in 2025 and made Vertex free to drive adoption, prioritizing network growth over immediate revenue.</p> <ul> <li>X/Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/pippellia">https://twitter.com/pippellia</a></li> <li>Nostr: <a href="https://primal.net/p/nprofile1qqs0dqlgwq6l0t20gnstnr8mm9fhu9j9t2fv6wxwl3xtx8dh24l4auswr6u0j">https://primal.net/p/nprofile1qqs0dqlgwq6l0t20gnstnr8mm9fhu9j9t2fv6wxwl3xtx8dh24l4auswr6u0j</a></li> <li>GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/pippellia-btc">https://github.com/pippellia-btc</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>KEY QUOTES</strong></p> <p>“Web of Trust is any network of relationship where trust is distributed and emergent. It emerges organically from interaction and connections—it's not imposed by someone else.” — Pip</p> <p>“Reputation is not a value, but it depends on the point of view. For me, your reputation is quite high because I follow you directly.” — Pip</p> <p>“Whatever you build, even if it's small, your audience on Nostr is gonna be yours forever—unless obviously you screw it up and people decide to leave you.” — Pip</p> <p><strong>KEY TAKEAWAYS</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Centralized verification is broken by design</strong>: Platforms profit from bots inflating user counts and scammers paying for ads. Meta reportedly requires special permission to remove spammers whose ad budgets exceed certain thresholds—spam prevention conflicts with revenue.</li> <li><strong>Your reputation should travel with you</strong>: On Nostr, if one app bans you, your identity and followers remain intact across every other client. Getting banned everywhere would require the entire network to decide you're toxic—a far higher bar than one company's content team.</li> <li><strong>Web of Trust solves the cold start problem for builders</strong>: Instead of building authentication systems, spam filters, and recommendation engines from scratch, developers can plug into existing reputation infrastructure and inherit the social graph's accumulated trust signals.</li> <li><strong>Personalized trust beats global authority</strong>: Different people can have different views on who's trustworthy. Vertex lets you borrow someone else's perspective—your technically-savvy friend's judgment on which app developers to trust, for example—without surrendering control to a platform.</li> </ul> <p><strong>TIMESTAMPS</strong></p> <p>[00:44] What Vertex is and the problem it solves</p> <p>[03:23] Why centralized trust verification is failing—the Twitter/X model</p> <p>[05:11] Pip's definition of Web of Trust: distributed and emergent trust</p> <p>[06:49] Why PGP's web of trust failed after 30 years</p> <p>[10:32] How Twitter's paid verification made identity meaningless</p> <p>[14:19] Meta's perverse incentives—when scammers pay more than spam costs</p> <p>[18:42] The primitives needed for healthy online discourse</p> <p>[21:26] Why reputation depends on point of view, not absolute values</p> <p>[27:13] How Nostr makes your audience portable and permanent</p> <p>[29:36] Can Web of Trust be weaponized? The exclusion question</p> <p>[34:52] Vertex's business model: freemium credits based on reputation</p> <p>[39:49] Why app store review models are going obsolete</p> <p>[41:57] Zapstore: using Web of Trust to verify app developers</p> <p>[49:00] What traditional developers get wrong about decentralized identity</p> <p>[55:21] What's next: explicit content detection and filtering</p> <p>[1:00:46] Personalized recommendations and onboarding without surveillance</p> <p><strong>RESOURCES & LINKS</strong></p> <p><strong>Mentioned in Episode</strong>:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://vertexlab.io/">Vertex</a> - Web of Trust as a Service for Nostr</li> <li><a href="http://npub.world">npub.world</a> - Nostr profile search engine powered by Vertex for accurate discovery and verification</li> <li><a href="https://zapstore.dev/">Zapstore</a> - Permissionless app store using Web of Trust for developer verification</li> <li><a href="https://serve.podhome.fm/episodepage/CitadelDispatch/cd167-pip--vertex-web-of-trust">Citadel Dispatch Episode 167</a> - Pip's previous interview with Matt Odell</li> </ul> <p><strong>Podcast</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>Subscribe: <a href="https://podcast.trustrevolution.co">https://podcast.trustrevolution.co</a></li> <li>Music: More Ghost Than Man</li> </ul>
play-circle icon
68 MIN
S02E15 Christian Keroles – What Dissidents Know About Bitcoin
DEC 12, 2025
S02E15 Christian Keroles – What Dissidents Know About Bitcoin
<p>“It's not enough for me to be taken care of if everyone else on the planet is living in a digital gulag.” CK explains why HRF treats Bitcoin as essential infrastructure for human rights—and why dictators keep failing to build alternatives that work.</p> <p><strong>Episode Summary</strong></p> <p>One billion people live in democracies with stable currency and property rights. Seven billion don't. Christian Keroles, Director of Financial Freedom at the Human Rights Foundation, argues that Bitcoin flips this equation—giving everyone access to the best property rights and most stable money regardless of where they're born. In this conversation, CK breaks down why authoritarian regimes are the most enthusiastic about CBDCs yet consistently fail to achieve adoption. Why activists from Russia to Myanmar to Venezuela are choosing Bitcoin as their financial infrastructure, and what HRF has learned funding nearly 300 open-source Bitcoin projects. The pattern is clear: governments build intranets while Bitcoin builds the internet of money. And just like email in the 90s, the protocol works—we're just waiting for everyone to get an address.</p> <p><strong>About the Guest</strong></p> <p>Christian Keroles (CK) is Director of Financial Freedom at the Human Rights Foundation, where he leads the CBDC Tracker, Bitcoin Development Fund, and activist education programs. Before HRF, he spent years as Managing Director and COO at Bitcoin Magazine and the Bitcoin Conference, building the infrastructure that shaped Bitcoin's public narrative. His team has distributed millions in grants to open-source developers and trained over 300 activists from 50+ countries on Bitcoin self-custody. CK discovered Bitcoin in 2017 through Laura Shin's Unchained podcast and hasn't stopped building since.</p> <p><strong>Social Links:</strong></p> <ul> <li>X/Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/ck_SNARKs">https://twitter.com/ck_SNARKs</a></li> <li>LinkedIn: <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/ckeroles">https://linkedin.com/in/ckeroles</a></li> <li>Nostr: <a href="https://primal.net/ck">https://primal.net/ck</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Key Quotes</strong></p> <ul> <li>“If you are opposing the guys in charge, you're not going to have access for very long.” — Christian Keroles</li> <li>“Bitcoin is freedom enabling technology. Bitcoin is bad for dictators, and Bitcoin aligns with Western liberal values.” — Christian Keroles</li> <li>“Rather than exporting troops, rather than exporting inflation, the way that we do that is we export freedom technology.” — Christian Keroles</li> </ul> <p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>CBDCs are the intranet of money</strong>: Dictatorships are most excited about CBDCs because they enable capital controls, population surveillance, and data collection on unbanked citizens—but they consistently fail at consumer adoption because governments are terrible at shipping tech products.</li> <li><strong>Debanked means playing whack-a-mole</strong>: Activists under authoritarian regimes describe constant account closures, using aliases, and moving between platforms. Bitcoin gives them permissionless access to digital payments for the first time—reconnecting them to the global economy.</li> <li><strong>Bitcoin adoption follows the email playbook</strong>: The protocol works perfectly for sending value anywhere. The bottleneck is that nobody has a Bitcoin address yet. As more people come online, network effects compound—and HRF is funding the tools to accelerate that adoption.</li> <li><strong>eCash, Nostr, and open-source AI are the frontier</strong>: HRF sees these technologies as complementary layers that make Bitcoin more adoptable. eCash enables jurisdictional arbitrage for product builders; Nostr creates censorship-resistant social infrastructure; open-source AI focuses on practical threats from surveillance systems rather than theoretical superintelligence.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Mentioned in Episode:</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://hrf.org/cbdctracker">HRF CBDC Tracker</a> - Monitoring government digital currency programs worldwide</li> <li><a href="https://zeusln.com">Zeus Wallet</a> - Lightning and eCash wallet CK uses personally</li> <li><a href="https://bitcoin.design">Bitcoin Design Foundation</a> - User research for Bitcoin builders</li> <li><a href="https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/check-your-financial-privilege-book">Check Your Financial Privilege</a> - Alex Gladstein's book on Bitcoin and human rights</li> </ul> <p><strong>Podcast:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Subscribe: <a href="https://podcast.trustrevolution.co">https://podcast.trustrevolution.co</a></li> <li>Music: More Ghost Than Man</li> </ul>
play-circle icon
54 MIN
S02E14 Why Ads Keep Winning
DEC 5, 2025
S02E14 Why Ads Keep Winning
<p>Big Tech captures $670 a year from the average American through attention and data. Voluntary payment has never broken past 5% adoption in 50 years of trying. So why does it still matter? Because it's not about replacing ads. It's about having somewhere to go when the platforms decide you shouldn't exist.</p> <p><strong>Episode Summary</strong></p> <p>Voluntary payment sounds like the answer to surveillance capitalism. Pay creators directly, cut out the middlemen, become the customer instead of the product. The philosophy is compelling. The data is brutal. NPR, Wikipedia, Patreon, Nostr — participation rates cluster between 1-5% and haven't budged in decades. Technology isn't the problem. Human behavior is. When given a choice, most people choose free with ads over paying directly. But this episode reframes the entire question. Voluntary payment doesn't need to replace extraction economics. It needs to exist as an exit. When Patreon banned Sargon of Akkad in 2018, thousands of creators watched their income evaporate. When they fled to SubscribeStar, Stripe and PayPal cut that platform off too. OnlyFans nearly killed its own business model because banks demanded it. Operation Choke Point proved the government can strangle legal businesses through financial pressure alone. The 5% who voluntarily pay aren't your main revenue stream. They're your lifeboat — an uncancellable base that doesn't depend on any platform's good graces.</p> <p><strong>Key Quotes</strong></p> <p>"Your ad revenue pays the bills. Your voluntary supporters are your insurance policy."</p> <p>"Stop thinking about voluntary payment as charity. Think about it as investing in creators you can't afford to lose."</p> <p>"Voluntary payment can't dominate. Defaults always beat choice. Human nature doesn't really change. But it can exist at a scale that makes it viable."</p> <p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>The 1-5% ceiling is structural, not technological</strong>: Patreon's conversion rate hasn't grown in a decade despite easier payments and lower friction. Better UX won't solve a values gap between early adopters and typical users.</li> <li><strong>Defaults beat decisions</strong>: Apple's tracking transparency saw a 55-point swing from a single design change. People don't choose surveillance — they just don't reject it. Same with payment. The path forward may be changing defaults, not convincing more people to pay.</li> <li><strong>Voluntary payment is deplatforming insurance</strong>: When Patreon, PayPal, or your bank decides you're too risky, most creators have no backup. Those who built direct relationships with even 5% of their audience have an escape route.</li> <li><strong>The hybrid model works</strong>: Chapo Trap House ($140K/month Patreon plus sponsors), Tim Dillon ($200K/month Patreon plus ads) — successful creators aren't choosing between models, they're using both.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Timestamps</strong></p> <ul> <li>[00:43] The promise of value for value — paying creators instead of being monetized</li> <li>[02:15] The $670 Big Tech extracts annually from the average American</li> <li>[04:30] Evidence voluntary payment can work: Patreon success stories and Apple's tracking data</li> <li>[07:45] The counterevidence: YouTube Premium at 9%, Netflix ads at 55% of signups</li> <li>[10:20] Nostr's payment participation — 0.5% despite frictionless Bitcoin integration</li> <li>[14:30] Historical data: NPR, Wikipedia, pay-what-you-want restaurants all hit the same ceiling</li> <li>[17:00] Why defaults determine behavior more than decisions</li> <li>[18:45] The exit option reframe — why voluntary payment still matters</li> <li>[20:30] The Patreon/Sargon cascade and SubscribeStar deplatforming</li> <li>[23:00] Operation Choke Point and financial censorship</li> <li>[25:30] How successful creators actually operate: the hybrid model</li> <li>[28:00] What this means for creators, listeners, and builders</li> </ul> <p><strong>Mentioned in Episode</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://fountain.fm">Fountain</a> - Podcasting 2.0 app with Bitcoin Lightning payments</li> <li><a href="https://nostr.com">Nostr</a> - Censorship-resistant social protocol with built-in payments</li> <li><a href="https://patreon.com">Patreon</a> - Creator subscription platform</li> <li><a href="https://opensats.org">OpenSats</a> - Open source Bitcoin and freedom tech funding</li> </ul> <p><strong>Podcast</strong></p> <ul> <li>Subscribe: <a href="https://podcast.trustrevolution.co">https://podcast.trustrevolution.co</a></li> <li>Music: More Ghost Than Man</li> </ul>
play-circle icon
24 MIN
S02E13 Cory Doctorow – Why Every Platform Betrays You
NOV 26, 2025
S02E13 Cory Doctorow – Why Every Platform Betrays You
<p>“The smallest government you can have is determined by the largest corporation you're willing to tolerate.” Cory Doctorow didn't just coin “enshittification”—he mapped the precise mechanics of how every platform you depend on will eventually turn against you, and why voting with your wallet won't save you.</p> <p><strong>Episode Summary</strong></p> <p>Cory Doctorow breaks down the three-stage process by which platforms lure users in, lock them down, and extract maximum value until the whole thing collapses. Using Facebook as the prototype, he traces how lock-in happens automatically through what economists call the collective action problem—your friends hold you hostage, you hold them hostage, and no one can agree when to leave. The solution isn't to shatter these platforms but to evacuate them through interoperability mandates and adversarial jailbreaking that lets users maintain connections while migrating to alternatives. Doctorow argues that the coming “post-American internet” will emerge as other nations realize they no longer need to tolerate US tech dominance now that tariff threats have materialized anyway—creating an unlikely coalition of digital rights advocates, profit-seeking entrepreneurs, and national security hawks who all want the right to modify and replace American firmware. For individuals, he's blunt: join the EFF or a similar collective and stop agonizing over consumption choices. Boycotts only work when they're organized, and the energy you spend debating whether to stay on X is energy you should spend building systemic change.</p> <p><strong>About the Guest</strong></p> <p>Cory Doctorow is a science fiction author, activist, and journalist who works as a special advisor for the Electronic Frontier Foundation and edits the daily blog Pluralistic. He coined “enshittification,” named the American Dialect Society's 2023 Word of the Year, and has authored over 30 books, including the recent <em>Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It</em>. A former European Affairs Coordinator for EFF who helped establish the UK Open Rights Group, he holds honorary doctorates from York University and the Open University and serves as a Cornell AD White Professor-at-Large and MIT Media Lab Research Affiliate. He lives in Burbank, uses Linux on a Framework laptop, and remains doggedly enthusiastic about RSS.</p> <ul> <li>Mastodon: <a href="https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic">https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic</a></li> <li>X/Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/doctorow">https://twitter.com/doctorow</a></li> <li>Blog: <a href="https://pluralistic.net">https://pluralistic.net</a></li> <li>Website: <a href="https://craphound.com">https://craphound.com</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Key Quotes</strong></p> <p>“The smallest government you can have is determined by the largest corporation you're willing to tolerate. And if you want a smaller government, have that government first and foremost enforce antitrust law.” — Cory Doctorow</p> <p>“People who tell you to vote with your wallet typically have thicker wallets than you and anticipate winning that vote.” — Cory Doctorow</p> <p>“We don't want to shatter the platforms. We want to evacuate them.” — Cory Doctorow</p> <p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Lock-in happens through your relationships, not technology</strong>: The collective action problem means your friends hold you hostage on platforms—you can't leave until they do, and they won't until you do. This automatic lock-in is why platforms can degrade service without losing users.</li> <li><strong>Interoperability is the escape hatch</strong>: The same tactics Facebook used to poach MySpace users (bots that scraped your feed and pushed replies back) could evacuate today's platforms. Mandating protocols like ActivityPub, combined with legal protection for adversarial jailbreaking, creates “supple but strong” pressure that companies can't easily evade.</li> <li><strong>The post-American internet is coming</strong>: Other nations accepted US tech dominance to avoid tariffs. Now that tariffs exist anyway, a coalition of entrepreneurs (who want to cream off monopoly profits), digital rights advocates, and national security hawks (who fear Trump bricking their tractors) are converging on the same solution: jailbreak American technology.</li> <li><strong>Individual action matters less than collective organizing</strong>: Stop agonizing over whether to stay on Twitter. If the platform still serves you, use it—then spend that freed-up energy joining EFF, organizing a union, or supporting mutual aid. Boycotts work only when they're coordinated; consumption choices are not politics.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Timestamps</strong></p> <ul> <li>[00:00] Cold open: Mark Zuckerberg's Metaverse pivot as peak enshittification</li> <li>[03:53] The three stages of enshittification using Facebook as case study</li> <li>[09:48] Why this isn't collusion—it's unshackled business seeking its ideal form</li> <li>[14:16] How tech consolidation enables regulatory capture</li> <li>[26:12] Protocols vs platforms: Why Bitcoin isn't the answer</li> <li>[33:06] Interoperability: How Facebook killed MySpace with the same tactics we need now</li> <li>[37:05] AT&T's 69-year breakup and why anti-monopoly law matters</li> <li>[44:53] The post-American internet: Why other nations will jailbreak US tech</li> <li>[52:37] Technology as alchemy vs science—why secrecy makes everything worse</li> <li>[58:42] Hollowing out platforms vs shattering them</li> <li>[1:02:01] Bright spots: Digital Markets Act and bipartisan interoperability momentum</li> <li>[1:05:09] Good regulation vs induced mistakes—the UK water system catastrophe</li> <li>[1:10:30] Practical advice: Join EFF, stop agonizing, organize</li> </ul> <p><strong>Resources & Links</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://eff.org/">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> — Digital rights nonprofit Doctorow recommends joining</li> <li><a href="https://www.boldtypebooks.com/titles/zephyr-teachout/break-em-up/9781250200891/">Break Them Up by Zephyr Teachout</a> — Referenced book on monopolies</li> <li><a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250840554/undergroundempire">The Underground Empire by Henry Farrell and Abraham Newman</a> — Book on weaponized American infrastructure</li> </ul> <p><strong>Podcast:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Subscribe: <a href="https://podcast.trustrevolution.co">https://podcast.trustrevolution.co</a></li> <li>Music: More Ghost Than Man</li> </ul>
play-circle icon
74 MIN
S02E12 Average Gary – From classified ops to open source
NOV 19, 2025
S02E12 Average Gary – From classified ops to open source
<p>Operating under a pseudonym fits the ethos—sovereignty starts with controlling your identity. Average Gary brought the “thinking shooter” principle from Naval Special Warfare into Bitcoin: you don't need to know every answer, but you need to know where to find it. His path from military intelligence through Microsoft to large-scale Bitcoin mining reveals how decentralized systems reward proof of work over credentials and why open source tears down the walls between citizens and the institutions meant to serve them.</p> <p><strong>Episode Summary</strong></p> <p>Average Gary spent 11 years in Navy intelligence as a Chinese linguist and Naval Special Warfare tech operator, learning discipline, cross-functional thinking, and how to act decisively in dynamic environments. He transitioned to Microsoft as a software engineer, where mentors guided him into Rust programming, then moved into FinTech before landing at a large-scale Bitcoin miner. His journey reveals how military training in networked analysis and independent action translates directly to decentralized technology work—where reputation systems replace bureaucratic credentials and proof of work matters more than permission. </p> <p>The conversation explores how open source development creates pathways from government service into sovereignty-focused tech, why Bitcoin aligns with veteran values of independence and service, and how showing up consistently in local communities builds resilience against centralized system failures. Average Gary's work with Bitcoin Veterans and the Shenandoah Bitcoin Club demonstrates that the transition from centralized institutions to freedom tech isn't about abandoning service—it's about finding better tools to serve with.</p> <p><strong>About the Guest</strong></p> <p>Average Gary is a software engineer at a large-scale Bitcoin miner and founder of the Shenandoah Bitcoin Club in Northern Virginia. He served 11 years in Navy intelligence, including roles as a Chinese linguist at the Defense Language Institute and tactical intelligence specialist with Naval Special Warfare. After his military service, he worked as a software engineer at Microsoft and in FinTech before moving into Bitcoin. He's active in Bitcoin Veterans, an organization helping military veterans understand and adopt Bitcoin, and regularly contributes to open source projects focused on sovereignty and decentralization.</p> <p><strong>Connect with Average Gary:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Nostr: <a href="https://primal.net/gary">https://primal.net/gary</a></li> <li>GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/average-gary">https://github.com/average-gary</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Key Quotes</strong></p> <ul> <li>“You can just do things, but when you do it, you better have an answer as to why you did it.” – Average Gary</li> <li>“If you show up and you're a good human being, if you put this excess time and energy that you've unlocked by saving in Bitcoin to good use in your direct immediate area, I think you're going to be rewarded.” – Average Gary</li> <li>“The best centralized system is when you control it, and I think anybody has the opportunity to do that in their local area.” – Average Gary</li> </ul> <p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Open source creates sovereign career paths</strong>: Contributing to open source projects builds a public proof of work resume that matters more in Bitcoin than corporate credentials—Average Gary emphasizes finding projects that improve government transparency or serve your community, then building your reputation through visible contributions.</li> <li><strong>Military discipline translates to decentralized work</strong>: The Navy's “thinking shooter” concept—knowing enough to act independently while understanding where to find answers—applies directly to Bitcoin development, where you need cross-functional awareness but don't need permission to contribute if you can justify your work.</li> <li><strong>Reputation systems replace bureaucracy</strong>: In Bitcoin's reputation-based industry, your GitHub contributions and project work speak louder than degrees or corporate experience—this levels the playing field for anyone willing to put in visible, verifiable work regardless of their background.</li> <li><strong>Local action builds systemic resilience</strong>: As centralized systems fail and Bitcoin creates new wealth, showing up consistently in local communities—coaching teams, joining churches, attending council meetings, or running ham radio clubs—creates the social capital and infrastructure needed when grid-dependent systems break down.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Timestamps</strong></p> <p>[00:00] Career arc from Naval intelligence to Bitcoin mining </p> <p>[05:30] Transitioning from military to Microsoft, learning Rust </p> <p>[09:45] Why family and bureaucracy drove the shift from Navy to tech </p> <p>[15:20] FinTech experience and recognizing surveillance in financial systems </p> <p>[22:10] How Naval Special Warfare training shapes decentralized thinking </p> <p>[28:35] Defense Language Institute, Chinese linguistics, and data analysis </p> <p>[33:50] The “thinking shooter” concept and cross-functional awareness </p> <p>[38:15] Moving to a large-scale Bitcoin miner as a software engineer </p> <p>[42:40] Bitcoin Veterans: helping military community understand Bitcoin </p> <p>[47:25] Why open source matters for government transparency </p> <p>[52:30] Building proof of work resumes through GitHub contributions </p> <p>[56:07] Local community action as centralized systems fail </p> <p>[59:10] Closing thoughts on consistency and showing up</p> <p><strong>Resources & Links</strong></p> <p><strong>Mentioned in Episode:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Defense Language Institute (Chinese linguist training)</li> <li>Naval Special Warfare (tactical intelligence operations)</li> <li>Rust programming language</li> <li>Kali Linux (penetration testing distribution)</li> <li>Bitcoin Veterans: <a href="https://bitcoinveterans.org">https://bitcoinveterans.org</a></li> <li>Shenandoah Bitcoin Club: <a href="https://shenandoahbitcoin.club">https://shenandoahbitcoin.club</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Podcast:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Subscribe: <a href="https://podcast.trustrevolution.co">https://podcast.trustrevolution.co</a></li> <li>Music: More Ghost Than Man</li> </ul>
play-circle icon
59 MIN