<description>&lt;p&gt;This podcast concludes my first judicial hearing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Remember, I was expected to defend myself in front of a committee of 3 elders with no representation; it was me against them. The two witness called to testify against me were both elders, one of whom is my brother. Both of these witnesses used conversations I had had with them, trusting that they were going to help me. Instead, they convened a meeting of the elders, brought their testimonies together and formed a judicial committee. This was a breach of clergy privilege.*&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Please pay careful attention to what can only be described as a personal bias on the part of one of the elders in the committee who was supposed to have been going on holiday with two of our friends.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Compare his questioning, coupled with the testimony of the two elders, with the statement made right at the end by the Chairman that the committee was not prejudiced or biased.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Remember, anyone who does not accept all of the Governing Body's interpretation of scripture is liable to face a committee such as I did.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ask yourself whether the Watch Tower Society allows it's members to enjoy the same level of freedom of thought and religion as it itself expects to be afforded.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Is there any wonder why some view the Watch Tower Society as a dangerous cult?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;*Jehovah's Witness elders consistently use the excuse of "clergy privilege" to avoid having to testify in court against suspected Jehovah's Witness pedophiles. Please check &lt;a href="http://www.silentlambs.org"&gt; www.silentlambs.org&lt;/a&gt; for further information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

Death or Obedience

Unknown

Death or Obedience - Part 10 - Part 2 of the 1st Judicial Hearing

JUL 31, 2009-1 MIN
Death or Obedience

Death or Obedience - Part 10 - Part 2 of the 1st Judicial Hearing

JUL 31, 2009-1 MIN

Description

<p>This podcast concludes my first judicial hearing.</p> <p>Remember, I was expected to defend myself in front of a committee of 3 elders with no representation; it was me against them. The two witness called to testify against me were both elders, one of whom is my brother. Both of these witnesses used conversations I had had with them, trusting that they were going to help me. Instead, they convened a meeting of the elders, brought their testimonies together and formed a judicial committee. This was a breach of clergy privilege.*</p> <p>Please pay careful attention to what can only be described as a personal bias on the part of one of the elders in the committee who was supposed to have been going on holiday with two of our friends.</p> <p>Compare his questioning, coupled with the testimony of the two elders, with the statement made right at the end by the Chairman that the committee was not prejudiced or biased.</p> <p>Remember, anyone who does not accept all of the Governing Body's interpretation of scripture is liable to face a committee such as I did.</p> <p>Ask yourself whether the Watch Tower Society allows it's members to enjoy the same level of freedom of thought and religion as it itself expects to be afforded.</p> <p>Is there any wonder why some view the Watch Tower Society as a dangerous cult?</p> <p>*Jehovah's Witness elders consistently use the excuse of "clergy privilege" to avoid having to testify in court against suspected Jehovah's Witness pedophiles. Please check <a href="http://www.silentlambs.org"> www.silentlambs.org</a> for further information.</p>