Mac vs PC-Now with 100% less bias!
I’ve just had it with these flamings by fanboys, so I’m just going to spread the facts.
Macs
To be completely honest, I barely have any experience with a Mac, though I can give a good opinion on it.
What I like about it is that all the built-in programs and features that are in a Mac? Built in bluetooth? Camera, high quality microphone, and speakers in some models? Hell yes.
The next thing I also like is the portability. Most desktop Macs (with the exception of the Pro) are all in the monitor. Good styling of the case and such make it also a style statement as also a computer. Macs to me are ultimate pre-packaged computer system. All you would need to use is already in the Mac.
Now you Mac fanboys are saying to me: “LOLZ YOU PH4ILZORZ. WHAT ABUT TEH FAST THAT IT CANY’T GET VIRUSSZ?”
Well, you are generally wrong. You can’t get viruses -in general- on a Mac…if you never plugged it into the internet. Macs DO get malicious software.
In general the term “virus” is very loosely said around as a fix-all in the computer industry for a piece of software that messes up the computer. And also, if Macs couldn’t get viruses, then why do they sell anti-virus software for the Mac? Most likely to buy something that they most-likely won’t need.
Moving on.
PCs and Microsoft
Now, when most of everyone thinks of a computer, they think of a computer running a copy of windows. In general, that is correct.
The PC is a very customizable platform, compared to the Macs. One exception is Apple’s Pro. The Pro is somewhat customizable with the PCI slots it has. With PCs, you can customize anything about it, even build one of scratch.
Now here’s what gets everyone on this debate: Crashes and software errors.
Literally, computers are perfect. They do everything perfectly. When a computer makes an error, it is because the computer’s CPU is following ALL the commands it is being asked of. Leading to show that ALL program errors in a computer are because of human error. Simple as that. If you’re the person who get’s their computer filled with blue screens faster than the speed of light, you’re obviously doing something wrong. I am a very smart computer user and know what to do in cases of complete computer failure.
Now the next thing everyone thinks of when the debate of Mac vs PC is :Windows
My response is “WHO CARES?” Windows is ONE of the many operating systems out there for the platform. If you have been living under a rock for the past millennium, there’s this nice open-source software called Linux. It is completely customizable. If you mac users don’t like how your PC OS isn’t working, learn some coding and make your own OS.
and as for price….ah.
There is obviously a extremely large difference between them.
Let me compare the most two expensive PCs and Macs I can get, prebuilt on the market.
First up is the PCs HP Firebird.
Here are the most important statistics.
HP Firebird with VoodooDNA 802 Desktop PC
* • Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 Processor (2.66GHz)
* • Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit Edition with SP1
* • 4GB PC2-6400 DDR2 memory
* • Dual SLI NVIDIA GeForce 9800S with 512MB GDDR3
* • 500GB 5400 rpm hard drive (2 x 250GB)
* • Factory-sealed liquid cooling system (CPU, chipset, GPUs)
Price: $1.7k (It’s not selling for $1.3k on sale)
Now, the most expencive Mac: The Mac Pro.
Two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon “Nehalem” processors
6GB (six 1GB) memory
640GB hard drive 1 640GB hard drive1
18x double-layer SuperDrive
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB
And all for the price of $3,299.00.
Processors first.
Pretty much the same for both of them. 2 Quad-core 2.66 GhZ.
OSs next.
The Pro runs on OSX and the Firebird runs Vista SP1.
But soon, Vista will be replaced to Windows 7, which is more efficient.
Now here is a problem that is near and dear to my mana-loving heart: Graphics.
The Firebird has 2 SLI 1500 MHz graphics cards.
The Pro has a single 1400 MHz.
It looks like the Firebird has won this. You can buy TWO Firebirds and still have enough money to buy a fancy, top of the line graphics card.