<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong data-start="101" data-end="121"&gt;Chris’s Summary:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br data-start="121" data-end="124" /&gt;Jim and I are joined again by Jacob as we discuss listener emails about “unicorn” status—our term for retirees whose Minimum Dignity Floor&lt;img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /&gt; and Fun Number&lt;img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /&gt; are both covered by secure income. We clarify what qualifies as secure income and explore whether a very low withdrawal rate from a conservative portfolio might serve as a substitute. We also touch on when rental income might count and how longevity risk influences planning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="" data-start="199" data-end="586"&gt;&lt;strong data-start="199" data-end="217"&gt;Jim’s &amp;#8220;Pithy&amp;#8221; Summary:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br data-start="217" data-end="220" /&gt;This week’s EDU is a dialog episode—where we take listener emails and use them as a jumping-off point to talk through the philosophy behind our approach. Chris and I are joined again by Jacob for a discussion on what it really means to be a “unicorn,” our nickname for retirees whose Minimum Dignity Floor&lt;img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /&gt; and Fun Number&lt;img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /&gt; are fully covered by secure income sources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="" data-start="588" data-end="1080"&gt;We get into why secure income isn’t just about predictability, but also about risk pooling, inflation, and longevity. One listener asks whether having an ultra-low withdrawal rate from a conservative portfolio might be good enough—and we talk through that with real-world examples, including a client case Jacob and I worked on. I also go off on a bit of a tangent (as I do) about SPIAs, mortality credits, and why I’m setting up a donor-advised fund that’ll stick around long after I’m gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="" data-start="1082" data-end="1384"&gt;If you’ve ever wondered whether it’s worth striving for unicorn status—or how to think through portfolio-based income—this is one of those conversations that gets to the heart of how and why we plan the way we do. Plus, you get to hear me throw a few curveballs at Chris and Jacob, which is always fun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post &lt;a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com/podcast/defining-unicorn-status-in-retirement-edu-2515/"&gt;Defining Unicorn Status in Retirement: EDU #2515&lt;/a&gt; appeared first on &lt;a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com"&gt;The Retirement and IRA Show&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

The Retirement and IRA Show

Jim Saulnier, CFP® & Chris Stein, CFP®

Defining Unicorn Status in Retirement: EDU #2515

APR 9, 202572 MIN
The Retirement and IRA Show

Defining Unicorn Status in Retirement: EDU #2515

APR 9, 202572 MIN

Description

<p><strong data-start="101" data-end="121">Chris’s Summary:</strong><br data-start="121" data-end="124" />Jim and I are joined again by Jacob as we discuss listener emails about “unicorn” status—our term for retirees whose Minimum Dignity Floor<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> and Fun Number<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> are both covered by secure income. We clarify what qualifies as secure income and explore whether a very low withdrawal rate from a conservative portfolio might serve as a substitute. We also touch on when rental income might count and how longevity risk influences planning.</p> <p class="" data-start="199" data-end="586"><strong data-start="199" data-end="217">Jim’s &#8220;Pithy&#8221; Summary:</strong><br data-start="217" data-end="220" />This week’s EDU is a dialog episode—where we take listener emails and use them as a jumping-off point to talk through the philosophy behind our approach. Chris and I are joined again by Jacob for a discussion on what it really means to be a “unicorn,” our nickname for retirees whose Minimum Dignity Floor<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> and Fun Number<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> are fully covered by secure income sources.</p> <p class="" data-start="588" data-end="1080">We get into why secure income isn’t just about predictability, but also about risk pooling, inflation, and longevity. One listener asks whether having an ultra-low withdrawal rate from a conservative portfolio might be good enough—and we talk through that with real-world examples, including a client case Jacob and I worked on. I also go off on a bit of a tangent (as I do) about SPIAs, mortality credits, and why I’m setting up a donor-advised fund that’ll stick around long after I’m gone.</p> <p class="" data-start="1082" data-end="1384">If you’ve ever wondered whether it’s worth striving for unicorn status—or how to think through portfolio-based income—this is one of those conversations that gets to the heart of how and why we plan the way we do. Plus, you get to hear me throw a few curveballs at Chris and Jacob, which is always fun.</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com/podcast/defining-unicorn-status-in-retirement-edu-2515/">Defining Unicorn Status in Retirement: EDU #2515</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com">The Retirement and IRA Show</a>.</p>