<p data-start="35" data-end="656">If you would rather not listen to the guys&#8217; banter about Jacob’s upcoming move to Iowa, Jim&#8217;s garden planning, and a listener correction about the word “imbibe” you can skip ahead to (<span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">33:30).</span></p> <p data-start="35" data-end="656"><strong>Chris’s Summary</strong><br data-start="50" data-end="53" />Jim and I are joined by Jacob Vonloh as we discuss using Buffered ETFs prompted by a Morningstar article titled “Buffer ETFs Are Not for Everyone.” We explain how defined outcome ETFs use options to provide an explicit amount of loss protection over a given period while limiting potential gains, and we outline why these products are generally suboptimal for long-term investors. We then connect this to investment positioning, focusing on risk capacity, distribution planning, and why dollars assigned to delay-period Minimum Dignity Floor<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> and Go-Go spending may require a degree of principal protection.</p> <p data-start="658" data-end="1224"><strong>Jim’s “Pithy” Summary</strong><br data-start="679" data-end="682" />Chris and I are joined by Jacob Vonloh as we take a listener-submitted Morningstar article—“Buffer ETFs are not for Everyone”—and use it to kick off what is going to be a series on principal protection. Morningstar does a very good job in this article laying out what it likes about buffered products, and it also makes some excellent points on where these types of products would fit and where they don’t fit. They’re not for everybody, but they could be of interest in certain cases, in a certain application, and we’re going to share how we use them.</p> <p data-start="658" data-end="1224">What I want to do in this series is broaden the conversation. Buffered ETFs are just one type of principal protected product. There are multiple tools in that category, and we’re going to walk through where they fit into distribution planning. As you transition from accumulation into what I call the Venn diagram phase, and ultimately into distribution, you have to stop thinking of your portfolio as one big portfolio and start thinking in terms of smaller portfolios—investment positions—based on assigned spending. Dollars earmarked for a legacy position can be invested aggressively. Dollars earmarked for immediate spending—like the Go-Go reserve or the reserve for your MDF—need a degree of principal protection. This ties directly into the Secure Retirement Income Process<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> and the See Through Portfolio<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> and how we navigate asset positioning in retirement.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Show Notes:</strong> <a href="https://www.morningstar.com/funds/buffer-etfs-are-not-everyone-heres-how-use-them-your-portfolio" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Morningstar Buffered ETFs article</a></p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com/podcast/using-buffered-etfs-edu-2607/">Using Buffered ETFs: EDU #2607</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.theretirementandirashow.com">The Retirement and IRA Show</a>.</p>