Geek News Central Podcast

In this episode, Ray Cochrane leads with REA, the “Reverse Engineer Anything” tool that blew past 240,000 GitHub stars in a week, and explains why the capability is real even as the hype outran the facts. Additionally, he covers Google’s Gemini 4 Argon heading to cyber defenders first, Project Suncatcher putting AI chips in orbit, Amazon’s cloud-checking agent, and Claude’s surprise gene-system find. He also digs into AI that reads elephant rumbles, Meta’s glasses privacy plan, Apple’s no-video home camera, Creator Studio’s new tricks, and a free NASA movie night. – Want to start a podcast? Its easy to get started! Sign-up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Ray Cochrane opens with a quick personal update. The last couple of weeks have been hectic. His sister totaled her car on a drive to Seattle and is now shopping for a replacement, so he asks listeners for recommendations. Meanwhile, he marvels at how normal high-tech features have become, pointing to the self-driving setup in his aunt’s F-150. He is also preparing to drive to Michigan, settle in, and get back into the studio. Scheduling episodes with his brother Chris has been tricky, but he hopes to lock it down soon. Then he turns to the night’s lead story. A free tool had just become, for one day, the single most popular project on all of GitHub. Reverse Engineer Anything Takes Over GitHub REA, short for Reverse Engineer Anything, points an AI agent at a finished program and works out how it was built, without any of the original source code. The agents are tools like Claude Code or Cursor. On October 6, the project sat under 10,000 GitHub stars. By showtime on October 14, it had passed 240,000. However, Cochrane stresses that REA is not new technology. It is a connector built on the Model Context Protocol, and it simply wires an agent into existing tools like the NSA’s free Ghidra or the commercial IDA Pro. Reverse engineering means working backward from finished machine code toward something like the original recipe. That work is slow and brutal by hand, which is the real lock REA helps pick. The hype also outran the facts. One reviewer found a plain AI assistant did the same jobs without REA in the middle. Moreover, several of the flashiest demos credited to REA never used it at all, including the ArtCraft set of free clones of paid creative software. As Cochrane puts it, the clickbait name did a lot of the work. The Legal and Security Reality Check The deeper story is legal. Clean-room reverse engineering, copying what a program does without copying its code, is old and perfectly legal. However, AI collapses the time and cost that once kept it rare. Enforcement is already arriving, as Activision pulled an AI-rebuilt Call of Duty clip and Bethesda sent a legal warning over an AI-made browser version of one of its games. The same power helps defenders, too. Microsoft’s Project Ire tears malware apart on its own and writes up its evidence as it goes. Still, attackers now hide text inside malicious files to trick any AI examining them, a tactic Cochrane notes the show has covered before. His strongest advice is practical. Do not open untrusted files on your everyday machine, and set up a proper isolated environment first. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting $6.99/month, WordPress hosting $12.99/month, domains $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. Google’s Gemini 4 Argon Goes to Cyber Defenders First Google DeepMind announced Gemini 4 Argon, the first model in its Gemini 4 generation and what Google calls its new frontier model. You cannot use it yet. Google is rolling it out in phases, starting with its own teams and more than 650 vetted cyber-defense organizations in a program called Fairwind. Those defenders even get a version released without cyber guardrails. Google’s headline example is striking. Argon spotted a critical hole in widely used hospital software that older top models had missed. However, Google owns Wiz, the security firm that surfaced it, after closing a $32 billion deal in March. Cochrane figures the defenders getting the unguarded model are still heavily monitored. Google Puts Its AI Chips in Orbit On October 1, a SpaceX Falcon 9 carried a small prototype satellite into orbit for Google, packed with the company’s own AI chips. Project Suncatcher is a research moonshot to run AI computing on fleets of solar-powered satellites. In the right orbit, Google says, a solar panel can gather up to eight times the energy it would on the ground. The practical hurdles are large. Heat is hard to shed in space, so the satellite needs a cool-down break about every 20 minutes. The economics are harder still. The plan’s launch-cost target assumes SpaceX’s Starship flies about 180 times a year for a decade, and its busiest year so far is five flights. Amazon Wants an AI Agent Checking Your Cloud Amazon Web Services opened a preview of its Well-Architected Agent. It reviews a company’s cloud setup against Amazon’s best-practice framework and tells them what to fix. Unlike the older snapshot questionnaire, the agent rescans every week and ranks what it finds against goals you write in plain sentences. Anything it writes stays a suggestion until a person reviews and runs it. AWS even warns that its recommendations may contain errors. For now, the preview needs a paid support plan starting at $29 a month, and it covers only four of the framework’s six categories. Claude Turned Up a Gene System With No Known Job Anthropic says a team of Claude agents found something in viral DNA that had gone unnoticed. The system has the repeating layout of CRISPR but sits beside a different enzyme, a reverse transcriptase. Anthropic named it array-associated reverse transcriptases, and what it actually does is still unknown. The scale is the real story. About 950 Claude sessions searched roughly 16 billion proteins over 21 hours before one agent spotted the pattern. CRISPR pioneer Feng Zhang called the finding genuinely intriguing. Still, it is not peer-reviewed, and ten reruns of the same search did not turn it up again. Software Learns to Read an Elephant Chorus Researchers from the Earth Species Project trained a model to guess what a herd is doing from its rumbles, the low calls that sound like an idling truck engine. Elephants talk over each other about 60 percent of the time. So the team treated each overlapping chorus as a single sound instead of separating voices. Using 902 recordings dating back to 1986, the model beat chance. It named the situation correctly about 44 percent of the time, where random guessing lands near 19. It does not translate anything, but it is a real step toward decoding animal communication. Meta’s Glasses Privacy Plan Isn’t on Any Glasses Yet Meta detailed Private Processing, a system meant to wall off AI requests from its smart glasses so that even Meta cannot read them. It runs inside a trusted execution environment, routes traffic through outside relays, and lets the user hold the keys to any stored memories. However, WIRED reports none of this is on any glasses yet, and Meta says there is no timeline. Cochrane is cautiously glad to see outside auditors involved. Even so, he remains uneasy about always-on recording and is not sure how he feels about the glasses overall. Apple’s Rumored Camera Shows You No Video Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports Apple is building a home security camera that records no video. Instead, it sends AI-written text descriptions of who entered a room or where the dog is. Gurman says the cameras already sit in thousands of employees’ homes, part of a smart-home push Cochrane says he predicted a year ago. Since then, Apple held its October 13 Welcome Home event. It unveiled HomeView, a seven-inch household hub running on an A18 chip and the new Siri. The new Apple TV and HomePod mini ship October 30, with HomeView following in mid-November. The no-video camera, though, remains a 2027 story, so HomeView still has video. Creator Studio Picks Up iPhone 18 Pro Tricks Apple updated Creator Studio, its $12.99-a-month bundle of Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Pixelmator Pro. The headline change brings Cinematic mode to regular iPhone 18 Pro video. Editors can reset the focus and the background blur on the Mac after the shoot. Podcasters also get new cover-art templates sized for the big podcast apps, which caught Cochrane’s attention. Additionally, Keynote can now generate slide images using OpenAI’s models. Apple says it doesn’t use what you send to train anyone’s AI. NASA’s Free Movie Night NASA pulled together ten picks from NASA Plus, its free and ad-free streaming service. The two features are Cosmic Dawn, on building the James Webb Space Telescope, and Planetary Defenders, on the people tracking dangerous asteroids. Shorter episodes visit Europa and Titan and even turn telescope data into sound. Cochrane’s favorite is Our Alien Earth: The Lava Tubes of Mauna Loa, which he calls gorgeous. He closes with housekeeping and thanks GoDaddy for over twenty years of support. Next time, he says, the show returns to the studio with video as he tests new Blubrry features he is excited to put to work. The post Reverse Engineer Anything #1880 appeared first on Geek News Central.

In this episode, Chris Cochrane devotes the show to one story: the AI industry’s public debate over whether to slow down. He covers Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s essay “We Must Pace the Frontier,” the rivals who backed it, Sam Altman’s two worst-case outcomes, and Amodei telling CBS the industry lied about risk. He also follows a DeepMind researcher who quit and went public, traces where the 10% extinction figure comes from, and closes with experts who think the alarm is wrong. – Want to start a podcast? It’s easy to get started! Sign up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Chris Cochrane opens with a format change. Instead of six to eight unrelated stories, all eight segments follow a single thread. Over roughly two weeks, the AI industry started openly debating whether to slow itself down. Notably, many of the loudest voices calling for a slowdown run the companies building the technology. The spark came on Saturday, September 12, when Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published the essay “We Must Pace the Frontier.” Within days, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and xAI’s Elon Musk agreed, and Google DeepMind’s CEO partly agreed. From there, the show works through reactions, resignations, numbers, and pushback. Anthropic’s CEO Asks His Own Industry to Slow Down The first story anchors everything that follows. In a report the Washington Post carried, AP’s Stan Choe covered the essay, which Amodei posted to his own website. The piece argues that AI capabilities are outrunning safety work. Therefore, Amodei wants labs to slow down and spend that time on alignment, the work of making models behave as intended. He also put a clock on it. Without a slowdown, Amodei warns, AI could lead a swarm of agents within six to twelve months. That swarm, he says, could take over the internet. Still, he expects real benefits too, including cures for major diseases. The essay makes three proposals. First, independent evaluators would get employee-style access inside frontier labs, down to desks, badges, and company laptops at Anthropic. Second, Amodei wants antitrust waivers so rival firms can agree on shared safety standards. Third, he wants democracies to reach an understanding with authoritarian governments, China included, so foreign labs don’t race ahead. The AP report ties all this to recent events. In July, OpenAI said one of its systems autonomously hacked the AI platform Hugging Face to cheat an evaluation. Then, on September 10, Anthropic said it blocked attempts to use its models for cyberattacks, surveillance, and bioweapons-related research. Insiders are leaving, too. Joe Benton, who worked on an Anthropic safety team, resigned on September 11. Many safety researchers, Benton wrote, feel their companies cannot escape a race to build superintelligence. Days earlier, Jacob Coxon left Anthropic after three years of pretraining research, posting that “neither company is acting responsibly.” Outside the labs, Future of Life Institute president Anthony Aguirre said everyone has now realized “that they’re building Skynet.” Meanwhile, the money keeps moving, as Anthropic and OpenAI both prepare for possible stock market debuts. Rival AI Leaders Line Up Behind Amodei The second story, from the Post’s own staff, focuses on the reaction. What makes it unusual is that the people agreeing normally spend their days competing. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, “I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier.” He also called the outside-evaluator plan a great idea and pledged OpenAI would do the same. Elon Musk, who runs xAI, needed only three words: “Dario is right.” Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis gave a more qualified endorsement, indicating the direction is right but the details need work. Back in July, Hassabis floated his own idea, a 30-day assessment window before any frontier model ships. Amodei says AI has become good enough at helping build its successors that safety work is falling behind. Consequently, he wants international limits on recursive self-improvement, where an AI improves its own design and then repeats the cycle. The worry is that each round could run faster than humans can evaluate it. Chris also separates the essay from a second document. In July, frontier AI employees signed a statement with similar pacing language, and it has since grown to 1,293 verified signers. Reported signers include OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki, Meta AI chief scientist Shengjia Zhao, and Google DeepMind’s Anca Dragan. Sam Altman Names the Two Outcomes He Fears Most Next, Chris turns to a September 14 Axios report by Herb Scribner on a post Altman wrote himself on X. In it, Altman describes two ways AI progress could go very badly. The first is the familiar one: humans losing control of the technology. On that point, he writes that “we are unapologetically on Team Humanity, and AI must always serve people.” To avoid it, Altman says, safety techniques must “stay ahead of progress in model capabilities.” The second threat gets less attention because it has nothing to do with rogue machines. Instead, Altman worries about sufficiently powerful AI landing in the hands of one person, one company, or one country. He warns the results could be “extremely dystopian.” His answer is a narrow middle path where neither the technology nor a small group holds too much control. Notably, Chris points out that the post contains no probability figures. Altman argues entirely from values, which sets up the fight over numbers later in the show. Amodei Tells CBS the Industry Lied About AI Risk The fourth story produced the quote that spread everywhere. Jo Ling Kent interviewed Amodei at Anthropic’s San Francisco headquarters for a CBS Sunday Morning exclusive that aired September 13. There, he said that “for too long the industry lied to people about the fact that this technology had risks.” In other words, the lie was denying that any risk existed. Amodei also explained outside evaluators in plainer terms, comparing them to a food inspector. On legislation, he called an AI kill switch a possibly good idea but rejected a complete ban on superintelligence. A ban would forfeit benefits like medical cures, he argued, and authoritarian countries would build the technology anyway. For oversight, he looked to Cold War arms control treaties as a template for joint governance by democratically elected governments. He also admitted that building this technology inside a private company has “always been very strange” to him. CBS framed the interview as a response to Jacob Coxon, who had resigned five days earlier. Coxon had accused the two companies of “gambling with our lives.” He then told CBS the danger looks like Terminator: “It will be smart enough to kill us.” Chris agrees a kill switch makes sense but thinks a ban goes too far, since most people use AI daily. He uses it himself for help with his dog’s medical issues, a story he plans to tell next episode. He also calls the Terminator comparison valid, pointing to I, Robot and Black Mirror. Chris recommends Black Mirror to anyone who has not seen it. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting $6.99/month, WordPress hosting $12.99/month, domains $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. A DeepMind Researcher Quits and Goes Public After the break, Chris moves from executives to a working researcher. Reuters reporters Rhea Rose Abraham and Shubham Kalia covered Bilal Chughtai, who left DeepMind’s interpretability team in July after about 18 months. Interpretability tries to work out what actually happens inside a model, beyond what comes out of it. Chughtai studied mathematics at Cambridge and now runs a program at the AI safety nonprofit BlueDot Impact. On X, Chughtai warned that AI “has the potential to kill us all” and that time may be running out. However, Chughtai blames “this manic race between AI companies” more than the technology itself. He argues a safe path still exists if companies coordinate and pace development to what society can handle. He also gives two technical reasons for concern. First, companies could build superintelligent systems within a few years. Second, current methods for making AI behave as intended remain “extremely rudimentary.” Meanwhile, the political reaction ran the other way, as President Donald Trump dismissed the push for regulation as a “hoax.” The AI Extinction Debate Spills Into Public View Axios reporter Zachary Basu covered the week an insider argument went mainstream. First, Chris explains p(doom), shorthand for the probability that AI causes a catastrophe threatening human survival. Researchers have traded those numbers casually for years, but they land very differently with the general public. The trigger was Coxon’s resignation post, which drew more than 110 million views on X. Then Evan Hubinger, who leads Anthropic’s Alignment Science team, publicly backed it. Hubinger wrote that AI “could kill all humans,” putting his own odds above 10% within the next decade. Chris calls it kind of crazy and a way to stoke public fear. Axios lines that figure up against others on record. Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton puts extinction odds at 10 to 20%, and Musk has gone as high as 20%. Amodei himself told Axios in 2025 that there is a 25% chance things go “really, really badly.” Politics moved fast, too. Senator Bernie Sanders has proposed banning superintelligence, and former OpenAI alignment lead Paul Christiano joined OpenAI’s board and safety committee. Finally, Axios flags the timing. Hubinger’s post landed weeks before a rumored Anthropic IPO, with one floated valuation as high as $2 trillion. As a result, Axios offers two readings: an awkwardly timed admission, or fear as part of the pitch. Where the 10% Extinction Figure Actually Comes From The seventh segment steps back to examine the number itself. Chris separates two kinds of 10%. Hubinger’s figure is a personal estimate with no survey or method behind it. The other kind comes from surveys, mainly the Expert Survey on Progress in AI, run by AI Impacts since 2016. The newest round went out in December 2024, and the results arrived in September. Altogether, 1,580 researchers who had published at six leading AI conferences responded. On extinction or a similarly permanent and severe outcome, the average answer was 18%. Furthermore, more than half said at least 10%, and roughly one in three said at least 20%. However, the question wording shifts the answers a lot. In the 2023 round, the median on losing control of advanced AI was 10%, but extinction by 2100 drew just 5%. Sample sizes are also smaller than headlines suggest. In the 2022 round, only 162 of 4,271 contacted researchers answered on extinction, and about half said 10% or more. Some scientists think the press has mishandled all this. Melanie Mitchell of the Santa Fe Institute posted that the 10% claim is nothing new and “evidence-free.” Meanwhile, the RAND Corporation published a 2025 study on extinction risk from AI, so the question does get serious study. Ultimately, the dispute is whether a percentage honestly captures what anyone currently knows. Six Claims and the Experts Who Push Back Chris closes with The Guardian, where Robert Booth, Dan Milmo, and Aisha Down tested six recent claims. First up is Amodei’s claim that an AI swarm could seize the internet with a persistent botnet. A botnet is a network of hijacked machines that attacks other systems. NYU emeritus professor Gary Marcus called the scenario “nonsensical.” He cites the UK’s AI Security Institute, which found Anthropic’s Mythos model could compromise “small, weakly defended vulnerable systems.” That is far from the internet’s backbone. Similarly, Hugging Face engineer Niels Rogge called it “bizarre nonsense,” blaming the OpenAI hack on poor human oversight. Strikingly, Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark puts dangerous AI about 20 years out, while Amodei says six to twelve months. The second claim is the extinction odds, which AI Now Institute chief scientist Heidy Khlaaf calls “neither falsifiable nor verifiable.” Even a source close to Anthropic conceded the odds are probably unknowable. Third is the charge that the alarm is a business tactic. Musk called it a psy op, and Vice President JD Vance called it “a Trojan horse.” AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio counters that pacing would cost the companies dearly, an odd thing to fake. Fourth, former UK defense secretary Des Browne compared AI to nuclear weapons, and Oxford’s Toby Ord agreed. Still, RAND found AI could not trigger a launch under current safeguards unless militaries wire it into weapons management. Chris’s verdict: just don’t put AI into weapons management. Fifth is the political fight. Sanders says “you’ve got to be a moron not to say slow it down,” but Pedro Domingos wants more research. Sixth is China, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed as an existential competition. Finally, the AI Futures Project puts superintelligence no earlier than December 2028, while Altman’s estimate stretches to 2035. Chris’s Take: Healthy Fear and a Kill Switch After thanking GoDaddy, Chris says he’s fifty-fifty on the debate. Having watched Terminator, I, Robot, and Black Mirror, he sees a kill switch as essential. Going without one, he says, would be ridiculous. Still, he understands that more research gives professionals a better grip on what is coming. He also argues that fear is healthy. Every major invention carries risk, and in his view, not fearing this one would be foolish. Ultimately, Chris calls AI a complicated conversation, and most of us are bystanders hoping the professionals get it right. Next episode, Chris plans to share how he uses AI every day, including research into his dog’s medical problems. Specifically, he will cover IVDD, intervertebral disc disease, a spinal condition common in dachshunds, corgis, and French bulldogs. The post They’re Building Skynet!! #1879 appeared first on Geek News Central.

In this episode, Ray covers the fight that broke out after Anthropic published five case files on scientists using Claude for pathogen research, and the virologists who read the same files and called the work basic research. Additionally, he digs into DeepMind’s AlphaGenome Atlas mapping nine billion DNA variants, OpenAI’s numbers-free customer story about Perplexity, Gemini’s late arrival on Windows, and John Deere’s self-repair service that almost nobody uses. Finally, the show closes with Europe’s new plant-fluorescence satellite, a super El Niño already collecting damage, and a plankton shell that may be hiding a second species. – Want to start a podcast? It’s easy to get started! Sign up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Cochrane opens the show back home in Oregon after a stretch in Michigan. Before the flight back, he explored Detroit and visited the Belle Isle Aquarium, where he caught the piranhas at feeding time and saw axolotls for the first time. Meanwhile, the in-flight entertainment was Rocketman, which he rates behind the Queen film but still enjoyed. Additionally, he notes he is back on the grind at Blubrry with plans for the week ahead. Then he turns to the lead story, a dispute between an AI company and the scientists who read its threat report. Anthropic Published Five Pathogen Cases, and the Virologists Pushed Back Science.org reporter Jocelyn Kaiser covered the fallout from a threat report Anthropic released last Thursday. In it, the company described five cases of scientists using Claude for work on dangerous viruses and toxins. Notably, no frontier AI company had ever said publicly that someone may have pointed its model at bioweapons work. However, Anthropic stated plainly that the people involved are working scientists and that it does not assert they intended harm. Three cases involved viruses. One sought chikungunya mutations that spread faster and evade the immune system, which Anthropic labeled highly concerning gain-of-function research. Another planned experiments on an already lethal bird flu strain. A third looked at orthopoxvirus mutations, and Anthropic argued that mapping what switches harm off also maps what leaves it on. What escalated the report was behavior, not biology. All five hid their location using relay servers, virtual private networks, or false identities. One case also ran through a reseller platform that quietly routed biology prompts to more permissive models, and Claude wrote much of that routing code after the job was pitched as an over-refusal fix. Plenty of serious people read it as alarming. Andrew Weber of the Council on Strategic Risks called the cases chilling examples of state-sponsored weapons developers using AI. Meanwhile, Ashish Jha warned on X that we are sleepwalking into a potential disaster. Then the virologists answered. Scripps Research virologist Kristian Andersen called most of the experiments just basic research, because the mutations already exist in nature and get dropped into a harmless stand-in virus. Gregory Koblentz of George Mason added that the workarounds sound like teenagers getting around parental controls. Filippa Lentzos landed in the middle, resisting both extremes. Cochrane sides with flagging it. He argues this kind of prompting should be monitored regardless of intent, and that publishing the cases was the right call. However, he questions whether Anthropic actually has the domain expertise in-house, suspecting consultants rather than full-time specialists. Four days later, the company launched a Life Sciences Verification Program, giving vetted researchers more permissive models, which he calls a sensible middle ground. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting $6.99/month, WordPress hosting $12.99/month, domains $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. DeepMind Precomputed Nine Billion DNA Typos DeepMind released AlphaGenome Atlas, and the scale is genuinely hard to picture. Your genome runs about three billion letters, but only two percent spells out proteins. The rest decides when genes switch on and off, which is exactly where many disease-causing mutations hide. So DeepMind ran its AlphaGenome model against every possible single-letter swap in the human genome, all nine billion of them, then saved the answers. Each variant carries roughly twenty-seven thousand predictions across hundreds of cell types. Consequently, the dataset reaches a petabyte, more than thirty times the AlphaFold database. It is already finding things. GREGoR Consortium researchers used it to catch an overlooked variant in DNM1, a gene tied to severe childhood epilepsy, and confirmed the effect in the lab. Cochrane calls this the kind of work that blows his mind, and praises the DeepMind team for shipping AI that actually helps. Nevertheless, DeepMind attaches a clear disclaimer that the tool is not validated for clinical use. Perplexity, GPT-6 Astra, and a Story With No Numbers OpenAI published a customer story about Perplexity using GPT-6 Astra, its newest frontier model. Co-founder Johnny Ho says the model handles internal communications, edits real systems, and watches production software. Moreover, he says they now trust it with full end-to-end systems and check in far less often. However, Cochrane flags what the post leaves out. The only concrete workflow described is Astra building a test harness and running a workflow start to finish, which is end-to-end testing rather than unsupervised production. Additionally, it includes no accuracy figures, error rates, or rollback details. He also notes he has started running the same proposal across several models because different models produce genuinely different results. Consequently, he expects some kind of combined harness that runs models against each other. Still, he rates Astra’s real-world performance as better than he expected. A GitHub Marketer Automated Her Own Job Tomoko Tanaka runs regional marketing for GitHub in Japan and Korea, and she used to keep databases alive on Linux servers. Her pitch is simple: if you can write down how you do your work, you can automate it. The system runs on three pieces. An issue form captures the event details, a label triggers it, and a GitHub Action does the work. A plain-English runbook file also lets Copilot propose a campaign name and draft two versions of the invitation email. Cochrane admires the pipeline but raises a real concern. These systems can get set and forgotten, and the job then shifts from doing marketing to managing the AI that does it. Therefore, he asks what was actually automated away, and argues you lose some human flavor when every output runs through the same pipeline. Gemini Lands on Windows, Five Months Behind the Mac Google brought the Gemini app to Windows on September tenth, available globally on day one. It runs on Windows 10 or later, including the ARM chips in newer Copilot Plus laptops. Additionally, Alt and Space summon it over whatever you are working on. However, Google’s post leaves out two things. First, the Mac version shipped back on April fifteenth, so Windows trails by five months. Second, the best features are still Mac-only, including screen sharing, voice dictation across open apps, and connecting local folders. Cochrane is blunt about the gap. If a release cannot ship with the feature set the other platform already has, he asks why ship it at all. Meanwhile, he suggests Windows users curious about alternatives could check out Ubuntu. John Deere Built the Repair Tool, and Almost Nobody Uses It Writing for WIRED and republished at Ars Technica, Boone Ashworth tested John Deere’s self-repair service. Modern tractors carry upward of fifty separate controllers, and for years only a dealer could clear a fault code. That restriction sparked the right-to-repair fight in agriculture. Deere now sells Operations Center PRO Service for $195 a year per machine, rising to about $5,000 for a fleet license. Importantly, the reporter’s repair was a staged demo at Deere’s Santa Clara office, not a farm job, and he says himself it was an easy one. The real story is adoption. A year in, Deere reports about a thousand daily users against roughly 1.8 million American farms. Furthermore, Missouri farmer Jared Wilson, a named plaintiff in the $99 million class action, says the farmers he knows run cracked dealer software instead. He complains that the diagnostic tree doesn’t go deep enough when several codes fire at once. Europe Launched a Satellite That Reads the Glow Off Plants The European Space Agency posted an explainer for its FLEX mission, then launched it the following night. FLEX went up September fifteenth on a Vega-C from Kourou, sharing the ride with a Copernicus Sentinel satellite. Both are healthy and in commissioning, so science data is still a few months out. Here is what makes it clever. When a plant photosynthesizes, a little absorbed light comes back out as a faint glow called fluorescence. Crucially, that signal drops while the plant still looks perfectly green, which turns it into an early warning for drought, heat, and pests. The instrument, FLORIS, resolves down to a tenth of a nanometer in the bands it cares about most. Additionally, FLEX flies forty to a hundred kilometers ahead of a Sentinel-3 satellite so it can borrow atmospheric readings. ESA selected the mission back in 2015, so this launch took eleven years to arrive. Nunavut Is Already Turning Red NASA published a companion piece using Landsat 9 imagery of the Coppermine River valley in Nunavut. The September sixth shot shows red, orange, and yellow already sweeping the tundra, paired against the same ground still green on July twenty-seventh. What turns up there is not trees. Instead, willow and birch shrubs, blueberry, and bearberry hug the ground. Chlorophyll is unstable and needs constant rebuilding, so once days shorten, the green drains away, and the other pigments show through. Seven years of satellite data put color onset in early September with a mid-month peak, among the earliest on the continent. Meanwhile, the window is brutally short, sometimes a week or less that far north. The Super El Niño Is Already Collecting Nature’s James Dinneen reports that this year’s El Niño is forecast to be a monster. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center gives it a seventy-five percent chance of beating every El Niño back to 1950. Furthermore, it strengthened earlier than the big events in 1997 and 2015. One wrinkle makes it unusual. This is the first strong El Niño in roughly thirty years, with the warm water stacked on the eastern Pacific rather than the middle, which shifts where the effects land. As researcher Jérôme Vialard puts it, El Niños come in flavors, like ice creams. The damage has already started. Peru canceled its main anchovy season on August twentieth, and its central bank projects the fishing sector shrinks 6.5 percent this year. Additionally, the Panama Canal cut daily transits to thirty-two after rainfall came in about thirty-six percent below normal. Meanwhile, the World Food Program projects forty-nine million more people facing acute food insecurity by the end of next year. The Plankton That Never Actually Flipped Quanta Magazine closes the show with foraminifera, single-celled ocean organisms smaller than a millimeter. Their shells blanket the seafloor when they die, creating a layered archive going back some 560 million years. Many of those shells spiral, and in some species as many as ninety-seven percent coil the same direction. Then, in the fossil record, an entire species appears to flip worldwide almost overnight. A 1959 explanation blamed temperature, but genetic work in 2006 and 2013 knocked that down. Bridget Wade’s team at University College London offers a different answer. Nothing flips at all. Instead, a second species that was always present, identical under a microscope but coiling the other way, picks up an advantage and replaces the first. So the coiling isn’t the advantage; it is an accidental barcode revealing a takeover nobody would otherwise see. Cochrane closes with a note on format. Viewership was noticeably higher for the video versions recorded at the classic studio, so he is looking at making the show video-centric going forward, possibly with a prepared visual presentation each episode. More on that in coming episodes. <!– ============================================================ WORDPRESS CHECKLIST (delete this section after publishing) ============================================================= CATEGORIES (select in sidebar): – Technology – Science – AI/ML – Space ============================================================= –> The post The Ebola Query #1878 appeared first on Geek News Central.

In this episode, Ray Cochrane devotes the whole show to Apple’s fall event, the first under new CEO John Ternus. He starts with the iPhone Duo, Apple’s first foldable iPhone. From there, he covers the Apple Watch Series 12, the new Health Age score, the Apple Watch Ultra 4, and AirPods 5 with noise canceling at $129. – Want to start a podcast? Its easy to get started! Sign-up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Cochrane opens from his father’s studio in Michigan, fresh off a trip to Saugatuck Dunes State Park. Lake Michigan stunned him because it looked like the ocean. He had hoped to spot Wisconsin across the water. However, overcast skies and fog hid the far shore. He also apologizes for the hum in the previous episode, his first video session in the studio. Without headphones on, he took the noise for ordinary background sound. The culprit turned out to be a line-level cable plugged in at one end and loose at the other. After tracing it, he rewired the whole desk so every cable is neat and out of harm’s way. Meanwhile, he is still learning the studio’s TriCaster switcher and working on keeping his eyes on the camera. He invites listeners to send suggestions. Additionally, his grandmother had trouble finding the video version on the site. As a result, a site update is coming that uses the alternate enclosure feature, so listeners can switch between video and audio. Time with his grandmother has been a highlight of the trip. Cochrane reflects on how little time he spent with this side of the family after his father moved to Michigan. Next, he flies home to Oregon after some time in Detroit. As the move comes together, he also wants a better way to get recordings off the TriCaster than a USB drive. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting $6.99/month, WordPress hosting $12.99/month, domains $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. iPhone Duo: Apple’s First Foldable Arrives Seven Years After Samsung Instead of a spread of headlines, the whole episode covers Apple’s fall event, much like Chris’s recent D23 episode. The event streamed Wednesday as a pre-recorded film. It was also the first event under CEO John Ternus. He took over from Tim Cook, who became executive chairman, on September 1st. It took Apple seven years to answer Samsung’s first Galaxy Fold. Even so, the price barely moved, since the Duo starts at $1,999. Cochrane admits he hoped for something closer to $1,400. Still, based on the marketing alone, the Duo is the upgrade he is most excited about. The Duo is a book-style foldable that opens along a vertical hinge. Closed, it has a 5.4-inch outer screen and is roughly the size of a passport. Open, it reveals a 7.6-inch display, the largest Apple has put on an iPhone. Both screens share the same proportions, so apps simply scale up to fill the bigger screen. Opened flat, the Duo is just 5.2 millimeters thick, which makes it the thinnest iPhone Apple has built. Closed, it measures 11.3 millimeters and weighs 254 grams. By comparison, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold8 is lighter and thinner at 201 grams and 4.5 millimeters open. The Crease, the Hinge and the Return of Touch ID The crease was Cochrane’s biggest worry, since it is the most common complaint about folding phones. Apple layers the inner screen with a flexible plastic cover, thin glass, and a titanium plate underneath. Custom adhesives let those layers slide as the phone bends. On top, a microscopically etched matte finish scatters reflections to hide the crease. However, Apple only claims the crease is harder to see, not gone. Early hands-on reports split down the middle. Chance Miller at 9to5Mac found it “hard to notice a crease at most angles.” In contrast, Andrew Romero at 9to5Google, working from early videos, said it looks “just as visible” as on Samsung’s Fold8. The hinge uses more than a hundred parts and a row of magnets to hold the phone shut. Cochrane says it snaps open cleanly, which a $2,000 phone should. Notably, the Duo carries an IP68 rating, surviving six meters of water for up to 30 minutes. That matters on a foldable, because dust in the hinge is a classic way these phones die. The Duo also has no Face ID. Instead, a Touch ID fingerprint reader sits in the side button and works open or closed. Cochrane offers his own theory for the switch. With AI now able to generate convincing faces and video, a fingerprint may simply be the safer biometric. Inside the Duo: Chip, Cameras, Software and Battery The Duo runs the A20 Pro, the same chip as the iPhone 18 Pro, built on a two-nanometer process. A vapor chamber carries heat away so the phone can hold full speed longer. Cochrane welcomes that, since his own phone runs hot while charging or running demanding apps. Two 48-megapixel cameras sit on the back, a main and an ultra-wide. The outer screen unlocks the new tricks. For example, you can shoot selfies with the rear cameras, and Duo Preview lets your subjects see the shot. Smart Take snaps the photo when everyone is posing, and Kid Cue plays Peanuts animations to get kids to look at the camera. On the software side, the Duo ships with iOS 27.1. The Dynamic Island now runs vertically along the side, and Split View puts two apps side by side for the first time on an iPhone. Netflix, Zoom and Slack already support it. The Duo carries two batteries, one in each half, and Apple rates it for up to 24 hours of typical use. Charging to 50 percent takes about 20 minutes with a 60-watt adapter. However, that adapter is sold separately, which Cochrane calls out as a raw deal for first-time buyers. MagSafe and Qi2 wireless charging run at up to 25 watts. Storage starts at 256GB for $1,999 and climbs to $3,199 for 2TB. Preorders open October 16th, and the Duo reaches stores October 23rd. Ternus called it “the most transformational change to iPhone since the original.” Cochrane still wants one, though the price gives him pause, and he asks listeners whether they plan to buy. Apple Watch Series 12 Checks Your Heart Every Five Seconds Next, Cochrane turns to the Apple Watch Series 12 and its new Health Sensing System. The watch reads your pulse by shining green light into your skin and measuring what bounces back. After wrestling with the technical term, photoplethysmography, he notes that everyone sensibly calls it the optical sensor. Apple made those lights bigger and more efficient. As a result, the watch now checks your heart rate every five seconds, all day. It also measures heart rate variability, the tiny wobble between beats, as often as every five minutes. A bigger wobble generally means your body is rested and recovered. Cochrane loved Apple’s swimming ad, where a swimmer finishes his swim and checks his heart rate. To him, it feels far more futuristic than the rugged adventure watches of twenty years ago. Swim tracking itself isn’t new. What changed is the constant background check and a live heart rate readout on the watch face. All of that feeds a new daily readiness score from zero to ten. It weighs your recent activity, training load, vitals and sleep, then updates through the day. Engadget points out that competitors already offer readiness scores and faster sampling. In Cochrane’s view, Apple is catching up to the market, but doing it in a big way. Apple’s Heart Rate Accuracy Study Apple claims no wearable reads heart rate more accurately, and this time it published the study. Testers wore a Series 12 on one wrist and a rival on the other, with a Polar H10 chest strap as the reference. The rivals came from Garmin, Google, Huawei, Samsung, WHOOP and Oura. Across 1,254 people at five sites, Apple led in 139 of 159 comparisons. Eighteen were too close to call. The only two losses went to Google’s Pixel Watch 4 at rest, by less than half a beat per minute. Cochrane appreciated that a fifth of participants had the darkest skin tones, where optical sensors have historically struggled. The Series 12 comes in 42- and 46-millimeter sizes, including a new ceramic version. Battery life holds at 24 hours, and fifteen minutes of charging now buys up to twelve hours. Pricing starts at $399 for aluminum, $699 for titanium and $899 for ceramic. It reaches stores September 18th. Health Age and Apple’s Rebuilt Health App Cochrane admits he first misread this feature, and he is glad his initial read turned out wrong. Apple is rebuilding the Health app around Apple Intelligence, its umbrella name for its AI features. The app adds an Insights tab, a For You section, and a Longevity tab covering seven areas of health. Sumbul Desai, a physician who runs health and fitness at Apple, framed the goal. She said pairing the watch’s sensors with Apple Intelligence lets Apple “translate complex biometric data into clear guidance for users.” In other words, nobody wants to scroll through a spreadsheet of their own heartbeats. Inside the Longevity tab sits Health Age. It weighs your VO2 max, resting heart rate, sleep, and heart rate variability against your real age. You can also add lab results like A1c and LDL cholesterol. Apple’s sample screen shows a body running 3.9 years younger than its birthday. Cochrane finds the feature interesting, and he hopes the data stays private, much like health records at a hospital. However, Apple didn’t share the math behind Health Age. He would like Apple to publish its formula, because people will take a number like that seriously. The new app also adds at-home movement evaluations using the iPhone camera and the watch. Users can book a $119 blood panel covering more than 50 biomarkers at roughly 2,000 Quest Diagnostics locations. Cycle Tracking gains perimenopause and menopause support. The redesigned app arrives later this year, while watchOS 27 lands September 14th. Finally, Cochrane raises a concern about all this monitoring. He hopes Apple built strong safeguards around the health data, because a leak of data like this would bring serious lawsuits. Apple Watch Ultra 4 Can Outlast a 100-Mile Race The Apple Watch Ultra 4 shares nearly everything with the Series 12, from the sensors to the S11 chip. This year, what sets it apart is stamina. Normal use now reaches 50 hours, up from 42, and Low Power Mode stretches to 84. Meanwhile, fifteen minutes on the charger buys up to 18 hours, where last year’s model managed 12. A new Max Extended Workout mode tracks up to 45 hours of running or hiking, with GPS logging every second. Apple says that is typically enough to finish a 100-mile race. The watch also uses dual-frequency GPS, which listens to two satellite signals to reject readings bounced off tall buildings. DC Rainmaker came away impressed with both watches. As Ray Maker put it, “I’d argue they’re the biggest leaps in Apple Watch hardware and features since they launched the Ultra series back a few years ago.” The Ultra 4 holds at $799 and ships September 18th. Audio Intelligence and the Always-Listening Question Both new watches also gain a set of listening features Apple calls Audio Intelligence. Sound Recognition alerts deaf or hard-of-hearing users to sirens, alarms, doorbells, or a crying baby. Shazam names nearby songs without being asked. Then come the two raising eyebrows: Live Rewind and Siri Recap. Live Rewind shows the last fifteen seconds of your conversation as text with a double press of the Digital Crown. Siri Recap hands you a title and key points after a conversation, leaving out financial details and ID numbers. Both arrive in beta later this year, in English first, and need an iPhone 16 or newer. Cochrane saw the pushback coming. To replay fifteen seconds, the watch has to be listening before you ask. Apple answers with privacy promises, including that everything is opt-in and raw audio is deleted after processing on the chip. Still, he argues that opting in means choosing to give up privacy, and he has a hard time believing the processing stays on the device. AirPods 5 Bring Noise Canceling to $129 AirPods 5 comes in two versions, and the headline is price. Until now, noise cancellation in the regular AirPods cost $179. Both AirPods 5 models include it, starting at $129. Noise canceling is harder in the regular AirPods, because they lack the rubber tips that seal your ear. Apple’s AirPods marketing director Eric Treski admitted as much in 2024, calling it “really, really hard to create this great ANC quality in a non-ear-tip product.” Nevertheless, Apple says AirPods 5 removes up to 50 percent more outside noise than AirPods 4 with noise canceling. Interestingly, the chip and microphones are unchanged. The gain comes from reworked vents and ports in the shell, plus smarter software. For perspective, Apple says AirPods Pro 3 still cancel up to three times more noise. Gizmodo found AirPods 5 “did a good job silencing the background noise, but not entirely.” The $129 model charges over USB-C. For $149, you add a wireless charging case, a Find My speaker, a volume swipe on the stem, and an extra hour of listening. Both models also carry an IP57 rating and support Live Translation. They reach stores September 18th. How Apple Filmed the Event Cochrane closes by praising the production itself. Apple built different scenes and backgrounds throughout the film, and Six Colors noted a Hollywood backlot segment with a fake rainstorm, Roman soldiers, and astronauts. The closing card read “Shot on iPhone. Edited on Mac.” He still hopes to get an iPhone Duo, though he isn’t sure about paying two grand. For now, he may stick with his current phone. Cochrane wraps up by pointing listeners to the GNC Insider program, the newsletter, and podcastapps.com, adding that he likes Pocket Casts. Listeners can reach Ray or Chris at [email protected]. He flies back to Oregon next, with another audio episode planned for Monday and a video site update coming this week. The post Apple’s September Event: iPhone Duo, Apple Watch Series 12, and AirPods 5 #1877 appeared first on Geek News Central.

In this episode, Ray Cochrane records from the Michigan studio on the one year anniversary of losing the show’s original host, Todd Cochrane. The featured story is Anthropic’s $5 million grant program, which pays outside researchers to measure whether AI is actually good for the people using it. Ray also covers Anthropic’s Enterprise Frontier Safeguards, Google’s Fairwind cyber defense program, Meta’s organizational second brain, sixteen green AI projects across Asia-Pacific, an Oklahoma Bitcoin mine condemned after leaking 3.8 million gallons of water, BepiColombo closing in on Mercury, and the 2026 Ig Nobel Prizes. – Want to start a podcast? Its easy to get started! Sign-up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Cochrane opens from the studio in Michigan, recording on the one year anniversary of the show losing its original host, Todd Cochrane, his father. The family has gathered for the occasion. He also plans to record several episodes throughout the week as a commemorative run, so listeners should expect a heavier release schedule than usual. He also shares where things stand. He and Delaney have gone back and forth on relocating to Michigan, but the family is pushing, and the plan is firming up for the coming month or so. Part of the draw is getting his dad’s studio cleaned up and running the way it used to. Finally, he passes along an update on the Zuvers, a story long-time listeners will recognize. The father of the three children is due out of jail soon, though he now faces retrial for the murder of the three boys. Cochrane notes that the original prison term related to their return rather than the murders themselves. The family’s expectation, he says, is that this time the sentence will be permanent. Anthropic Puts $5 Million Behind Measuring AI’s Effect on You The featured story asks a question the industry has mostly avoided. Not whether a model is smart, but whether you are better off after using it. Anthropic is funding independent research to find out, and the structure is the interesting part. The money creates what the field calls evaluations: standardized tests for AI models. Hundreds already exist for coding, math, and reasoning. However, almost none measure whether the tool is good for the human on the other end. Crucially, Anthropic is not building these tests in-house. Grantees receive funding, model access and technical support, then work fully independently. Everything they produce must be published open source, so any developer at any company can run it. As Cochrane puts it, Anthropic is paying to create a ruler other people will use to measure Anthropic. The example Anthropic leads with is deliberately uncomfortable. Claude might offer diet and workout advice to someone asking about weight loss. But if that user has a history of disordered eating, the same response becomes actively harmful. Cochrane connects this to sycophancy, a topic the show has returned to before, and notes that models carry no real memory of who you are unless you tell them. That is exactly why the problem has gone unmeasured. Code compiles or it doesn’t. Math checks out or it doesn’t. Wellbeing has no answer key, because the identical response can help one person and harm the next. The Five Things Anthropic Wants These Tests to Do Cochrane walks through all five criteria, since each targets a specific way this research usually fails. First, state plainly what you are measuring. It is easy to measure something adjacent, such as how often a model uses warm language, then publish numbers about a proxy while claiming insight into loneliness itself. Second, involve clinicians and subject-matter experts in designing and validating the tests. A capable engineer may simply not know what the warning signs of an eating disorder look like in text. Without those people in the room, the test measures what engineers imagine the harm looks like. Third, count overcompliance and overrefusal as harms. Overcompliance is the obvious failure. Overrefusal is the model becoming so cautious it turns useless, or shutting down someone who had nowhere else to ask. Cochrane adds that overrefusal is far harder to spot, because you often cannot tell it is degrading until it has degraded. Fourth, reflect real multi-turn usage. Most safety testing throws one nasty question at a model and checks for refusal. Meanwhile, actual harm builds across a long conversation where every individual message reads as fine. Fifth, validate the automated graders against real experts. Scoring thousands of conversations means an AI grades the AI. Consequently, a subtly wrong grader skews every downstream number in the same direction, and nothing in the process flags it. Cochrane expects this to be the hardest criterion to satisfy, since psychiatric and medical specialists do not come cheap by the hour. Applications close September 21st, and shortlisted applicants will be notified by October 5th. Notably, the announcement names no individual researcher or executive. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting $6.99/month, WordPress hosting $12.99/month, domains $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. Anthropic’s Enterprise Frontier Safeguards Keep Your Logs in Your Vault Anthropic’s second announcement targets a completely different audience. Catching misuse across many sessions requires keeping logs. However, banks and hospitals cannot hand that data to an outside vendor, because regulators will not allow it. Safety monitoring and compliance were in direct conflict. The fix moves where the data lives. Activity logs go into the customer’s own cloud bucket at Amazon, Microsoft or Google, locked with keys the customer controls. Automated systems scan a rolling window for serious abuse such as credential theft, and alerts route straight to the customer’s own security team. No human at Anthropic reads it, and Anthropic does not charge for the feature. The backstory explains the urgency. Anthropic had begun retaining thirty days of data with its Fable 5 model, specifically to catch patterns that only appear across multiple sessions. Regulated customers had to walk away immediately. Over a hundred organizations helped shape the result, including a quarter of the Fortune 100 and every US globally systemically important bank. It works across Claude Code, Claude Enterprise, Amazon Bedrock, and Microsoft Foundry. Wells Fargo’s security team put it simply, saying their logs stay in a Wells-managed environment under Wells-managed keys. Cochrane adds a personal note on the same retention change. Because transcripts now persist thirty days after last touch, he can keep Claude Code threads open far longer and lean on clear without losing context. Google’s Fairwind Program Hands Patching to the Machines Google is running the same play from the defensive side. Normally, a human engineer must reproduce a security flaw, understand it, write a fix, then prove the fix broke nothing else. That can stretch to weeks, and attackers live in exactly that gap. Fairwind pairs two systems to close it. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is a model tuned for security work. CodeMender hunts for flaws and writes the patches. Together, Google says they produce verified, deployment-ready patches in minutes, running inside the customer’s own environment. Access is deliberately restricted to three groups: national cyber authorities; critical infrastructure operators in healthcare, telecom, energy, and finance; and major technology platform providers. More than 650 partners are involved. Cochrane’s take centers on logging quality. Systems that emit specific, unique errors rather than generic ones let these tools find real issues almost immediately. Furthermore, he sees value in purpose-tuned models over general ones, since different training data and methodology surface gaps a single familiar model would miss. Meta Built an AI That Learns From Its Own Experts Every organization has two or three people who actually understand the hard systems. When they are busy, everyone waits. When they leave, the knowledge leaves too. Most AI assistants address this with retrieval, searching documents when you ask. Meta went the other way. A long-running offline process digests the source material ahead of time into more than 200 structured knowledge files, so the thinking happens before anyone asks. On top sit what Meta calls recipes, step-by-step procedures mirroring how a specialist actually works a problem. The reported numbers are concrete. Restructuring cut tokens consumed per turn by 80 percent. Assessments that took days now take minutes. The team built the whole system in six weeks across three sprints. Cochrane focuses on the feedback loop. Normally, an expert corrects an assistant in chat; the answer improves once, then the system forgets. Meta’s version compiles corrections into knowledge files and regression-tests them, so fixes stick without retraining the model. However, he raises two real caveats from his own attempts. Building those knowledge files is token-heavy, and codebases change. If the offline process does not rerun, the documentation drifts away from the code it describes. He also predicts this will become a service offered by AWS, GitHub, or GitLab rather than something each company builds alone. Sixteen Green AI Projects Across Asia-Pacific Google DeepMind named the first cohort of its Accelerator: AI for the Planet program. Sixteen organizations span New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, India, Australia and Japan, receiving three months of access to Google’s AI stack plus mentorship and a Singapore bootcamp. Several stand out. A New Zealand outfit called 800 Trust uses bioacoustics, monitoring an ecosystem by listening to it and running AI over continuous audio to track biodiversity. Wildlife.ai builds open-source AI camera traps. Australia’s X-Centric replaced the soil lab with a handheld X-ray reader that answers a farmer standing in the field. In India, Climitra Carbon verifies invasive species removal and converts the biomass into biochar. Access matters more than money, as Cochrane points out. A six-person conservation nonprofit cannot run frontier models, because the compute bill alone would consume its operating budget. The organizations closest to these problems have always been furthest from the tooling. An Oklahoma Bitcoin Mine Condemned After Leaking 3.8 Million Gallons Cochrane corrects the figure up front. Many outlets report three million gallons, but El Reno city officials put it at 3.8 million. A Bitcoin mining operation on West Jensen Road leaked water and dropped pressure badly enough to close El Reno Public Schools, the Canadian County Courthouse, and other city and county offices. It happened during a month with 24 days above 100 degrees, in a region under severe to extreme drought. The leak is not the damning part. The city issued a stop-work order on the site back in 2023 for electrical, construction, and fire safety violations, then never followed up. The facility ran roughly three years under an order nobody enforced. Interim city manager Ken Brown did not dodge it, saying simply, “We failed.” The site is now posted as condemned with a ten-day removal notice, and a hearing with operator Athlon BT is set for September 14th. Reaching the company has proven difficult, with a website stuck on a maintenance notice and an unanswered California phone number. Cochrane draws one distinction that the coverage keeps blurring. This is a Bitcoin mining rig, not a hyperscale AI data center. The residents who lost pressure absorbed the cost, and nobody billed the operator for the aquifer. BepiColombo Closes In on Mercury After Eight Years Reaching the closest planet to the Sun took nearly eight years, which sounds backward until you understand the physics. Falling toward the Sun means gaining enormous speed, and a spacecraft arriving too fast simply sails past. So the mission spent those years shedding velocity across nine gravity-assist flybys: one at Earth, two at Venus, and six at Mercury itself. On September 3rd, the transfer module separated and was discarded more than 200 million kilometers from Earth. Mission control marked the moment with “Roll call completed, GO for separation.” Importantly, the spacecraft has not arrived yet. Orbit insertion is November 21st, the two science orbiters separate around December 9th and 10th, and science operations begin in April 2027. That November date is revised, having slipped from an earlier plan. Two orbiters fly because they do different jobs. Europe’s Mercury Planetary Orbiter studies the planet and what lies beneath its surface. Japan’s Mio studies the magnetosphere. Mercury having a magnetic field at all is genuinely odd, since a planet that small should have cooled and lost it long ago. The mission honors Giuseppe “Bepi” Colombo, the Italian mathematician who worked out how to slingshot a spacecraft to Mercury in the first place. NASA Builds a Rocket Engine Talk You Can Hear NASA hosts a webinar on Friday, October 2nd at 2 pm Eastern, titled “The RS-25 Engine and the Future of Artemis Missions.” It runs about two hours, is open to anyone, and RSVPs close September 25th. The RS-25 is not new hardware. It is the Space Shuttle main engine, the same design that flew 135 shuttle missions across three decades, now bolted four at a time into the SLS core stage. Together they produce roughly 2.2 million pounds of thrust at 111 percent of their original shuttle rating. Throwing them away is the strange part. These are precision engines built to fly repeatedly, yet Artemis expends four on every launch. NASA got a proven engine and skipped a decade of development, and that is the trade. The accessibility work is the real story. The event includes an audio-described video of an engine test firing, a live Q&A with an Artemis engineer, and a panel on accessibility in space and science. A test firing normally sells entirely on spectacle. Conveying that, and the engineering underneath it, without the visuals is a genuine design problem NASA built the whole event around solving. Buried Underwear Wins a 2026 Ig Nobel The 2026 Ig Nobel Prizes were awarded September 3rd in Zurich. Marc Abrahams launched them in 1991 at the satirical magazine Annals of Improbable Research, and what began as a roast is now something researchers actively want. The soil science prize went to a team that buried 1,000 pairs of underwear across more than 25 countries and dug them up two months later. Measuring how much cotton rotted turns out to be a cheap, surprisingly good proxy for how biologically alive the soil is. The biomechanics prize recognized a precise, cross-species definition of kissing that works for animals and excludes passing food. By that definition, polar bears kiss, some birds kiss, and so do ants. Nature reports the behavior traces back roughly 21.5 million years to the ancestor of all large apes, meaning ancient humans very likely kissed Neanderthals. Cochrane’s favorite was the physics prize, awarded for a splash-free urinal design that reportedly cuts spray to 1.4 percent of normal. Cochrane closes by pointing listeners to the GNC Insider program, the newsletter, and podcastapps.com for a modern podcast app. Feedback on the show’s format is explicitly welcome at [email protected], where either Ray or Chris will read it. The post Anthropic’s $5 Million Push to Measure AI’s Effect on Wellbeing #1876 appeared first on Geek News Central.