Sign In
Sign In
UK Apologetics Library
http://ukapologeticslibrary.net
Recent Episodes
Is the King James Bible the only trustworthy translation, or is there more to the story? The debate over KJV-Onlyism and KJV-Preferred positions has sparked controversy for decades. At UK Apologetics Library, we take a critical approach—examining manuscript evidence, textual traditions, and historical context to provide a balanced and well-researched perspective.
In this post, we dive into common misconceptions, overlooked historical facts, and the real issues behind the KJV-Only debate. Whether you prefer the KJV or are open to other translations, understanding the arguments from both sides is crucial.
What You’ll Discover:
Why KJV-Onlyism struggles under textual scrutiny The strengths and weaknesses of the Majority Text and Textus Receptus How theological bias impacts translation debates The UK Apologetics Library’s position on textual preservation
If you’re serious about getting to the truth beyond tradition, this is a discussion you won’t want to miss. Click below to explore our in-depth analysis!
Read More Here: http://ukapologeticslibrary.net/kjv-only-kjv-prefared/
The post Critical Insights into KJV-Onlyism and the UK Apologetics Library’s Position appeared first on UK Apologetics Library.
The Bible Project and the Gospel: A Cause for Concern?
Introduction
The Bible Project, founded by Dr. Tim Mackie, has gained widespread recognition for its visually engaging and accessible explanations of biblical themes. However, concerns arise when theological accuracy is compromised in the process. One such concern is the portrayal of Israel and the Church in their presentation of Luke’s Gospel. This article seeks to examine whether the Bible Project is promoting Supersessionism—the idea that the Church has replaced Israel—and how this affects the integrity of the gospel message.
Seeking Clarity: An Unanswered Inquiry
Having watched the Bible Project’s video on Luke’s Gospel, I sought clarification on what appeared to be a suggestion that the Church is the ‘New Israel.’ To ensure I had not misunderstood, I reached out directly to the Bible Project. My primary concern stemmed from an interpretation that seems to originate from W.E. Hull’s thesis, “A Structural Analysis of the Gospel of Luke,” which suggests that the tribes of Israel have disappeared. This notion appears to contradict the book of Revelation, which explicitly states that God will restore the twelve tribes during the millennium (Revelation 7:4-8).
Based on 1 Peter 3:15, which commands believers to be ready to give an answer for their faith, I expected a response engaging with these concerns. Instead, I received the following reply:
“Hi, Mig! Thank you for reaching out.
We really appreciate that you’ve engaged with our content and have questions! Unfortunately, our audience engagement team is not equipped to discuss in-depth theology questions on a case-by-case basis. While we value the significance of your question, we are not able to address it specifically.
Our primary role is to help our audience navigate the collection of creative resources we have produced. We realize the inevitability of questions emerging from particular ideas and themes, but these inquiries are great conversation starters with people in your local spaces — at church, a small group, or a gathering of like-minded friends.”
This response raised further concerns. If a theological teaching ministry cannot clarify its own doctrinal positions, then what assurance do viewers have that the material is biblically sound?
Theological Implications: Supersessionism in Luke’s Gospel?
A key issue in Luke’s Gospel is whether it teaches that Jesus established a ‘New Israel’—a claim that, if true, would suggest that the Jewish people no longer hold a distinct place in God’s redemptive plan. Some interpret Acts 28:28, which states, “Therefore, I want you to know that God’s salvation has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will listen!” as evidence that Luke presents the Church as replacing Israel. This interpretation is common among Pentecostal circles but is not universally accepted.
On the contrary, the book of Acts also records the continued faithfulness of Jewish believers:
- Acts 2:41 – “About three thousand were added to their number that day.”
- Acts 4:4 – “Many who heard the message believed; so the number of men who believed grew to about five thousand.”
- Acts 6:7 – “The word of God spread; the number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.”
- Acts 21:20 – “You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law.”
These passages demonstrate that Luke did not envision the Jewish people as being replaced but rather emphasized their continued role in God’s redemptive plan.
The Bible Project’s Responsibility
Given that the Bible Project is a widely influential resource, its theological accuracy carries significant weight. If it is promoting a version of Luke’s Gospel that subtly endorses Supersessionism, then it risks distorting the nature of the gospel itself. The absence of direct engagement with theological questions further exacerbates the problem, as it leaves their audience without critical clarifications.
As the Bereans in Acts 17:11 were commended for examining the Scriptures daily, viewers must likewise critically assess whether the Bible Project’s content aligns with biblical truth. Additionally, Revelation 22:18-19 warns against adding to or taking away from God’s Word:
“And if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life.”
This is not a minor issue. Any misrepresentation of the biblical narrative—intentional or unintentional—can lead to significant theological errors, especially for younger audiences who may lack the discernment to identify doctrinal deviations.
Conclusion
The Bible Project’s reluctance to clarify its stance on Supersessionism is concerning. While their videos are engaging and educational, they must ensure that their theological interpretations align with Scripture. If their portrayal of Luke’s Gospel implies that Jesus established a ‘New Israel’ at the exclusion of the Jewish people, then they risk misleading their audience on a foundational gospel issue.
As believers, we must uphold the integrity of Scripture and remain vigilant against theological distortions. The Bible Project, as a major teaching resource, should take responsibility for addressing these concerns with transparency and biblical accuracy. Until they do, their content must be approached with caution.
In Christ,
Miguel Hayworth
The post Is Tim Mackie’s Bible Project distorting the gospel and leading unsuspecting youth into serious error? appeared first on UK Apologetics Library.
Links on this page do not necessarily constitute an endorsement but mainly for research purposes.
There are theological differences within his teaches I would not call him an outright heretic but I have been cautious 1) Leonard has taught and recommended Rhanhard Bonki, Bonki was later exposed in faking claims that the dead were raised in South Africa as one of many examples, I have found dubious claims Ravenhill had made about Bonki, means that i believe out of genuine ignorance Ravenhill was speaking in ignorance, but this is not a good move from a bible teacher.,
https://web.archive.org/web/20030203134422/http://www.cfan.org/offices/usa/testimonies/resurrection/page1.htm
Though I do agree with Leonard Ravenhills teaching on Godly, Righteous hatred and sinners, I do not accept the whole proponent of the Holiness movement through his teaching that gave birth later to Lordship Salvation, Lordship salvation can be traced and rooted in a man who claimed himself to be a mystic Charles Finney
http://www.bodysoulandspirit.net/mystical_experiences/read/notables/finney.shtml
https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/philosophy-and-religion/protestant-christianity-biographies/charles-grandison-finney
I do however regard the doctrine of Lordship salvation as heretical and is a doctrine pushed by neo Calvinists, it was not until Billy Graham had made it popular that since McArthur had made it in recent years accepted amongst many protestant churches that had further encapsulated our unity with the RCC, in which I believe Ravenhill was a key proponent of the ecumenical movement, due to people who had been led into error by Ravenhills promotion of Paul Cain, and Mystic George Fox who was a Quaker.
However, Raven hill is not a false prophet due to never making predictions or putting dates on further as men like Jonathan Khan has done, on the other hand, Ravenhill has spoken at John Wimber’s Vineyard Church, which was founded by the Late Lonnie Frisby who struggled with homosexuality at the time, Lonnie was never mentioned by Vinyard for obvious reasons.
Leonard Ravenhill has often been promoted by Paul Washer who has been partnering with Roman Catholic backed Martin Bucer Seminary The seminary is presided over by the virulent Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher. Schirrmacher is a premier ecumenical leader and a personal friend of Pope Francis.
We recently released a video (April 22, 2018) which Highlighted Paul Washer’s slated speaking at the Cross ’19 Conference wherein will be several who routinely partner with Hillsong, Jesus Culture, The Passion Conference and other heretical organizations. Among those listed are Trip Lee, whom Washer calls a personal friend. Trip Lee is a good friend and promoter of both Hillsong and Jesus Culture, and Paul has NEVER publicly addressed this nor does he seem to care. The social justice, Marxist embracing bag of folly that is Thabiti Anyabwile is also scheduled to speak at Cross ’19, as is John Piper, the Rick Warren-promoting, Lectio Divina-practicing friend of Carl Lentz and Louie Giglio the Pope-kisser. The M.O. these days is that of Eli with his sons; simply turn a blind-eye to sin because of “cowardice or self-preservation” (to quote Paul Washer). The various compromises and heresy embracing being propagated by the profiteers at this conference were highlighted, and it had quite an impact.
The latest installment showcases Heart Cry Missionary Society’s open partnership with Martin Bucer Seminary whose president is Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher. For those who have not seen the video, I must implore you to watch it immediately (click the red link above). Thomas Schirrmacher is a personal friend and advocate of Pope Francis and all things both Catholic and ecumenical. In addition to presiding over the Martin Bucer Seminary he is on the senior leadership team of the World Evangelical Alliance and a committee member of the Global Christian Forum, both of which are in partnership with the ever ecumenical and demonic World Council of Churches. The term “demonic” is not used lightly. It must be understood that the three aforementioned organizations are, without question, working in accord with the spirit of antichrist. They are global in nature as all of their names imply and their objective is to usher in a global religion under the guise of “unity.”
Thomas Schirrmacher & Franklin Ferreira Sponsored by HeartCry
Thomas Schirrmacher Loves Pope Francis
its sad that the Ravenhill Rabbit hole has lead to compromise, but as the scriptures say you will know them by there fruits, we know that Ravenhill in the past has promoted Billy Graham.
the end result is many roads lead to rome.
A session of the Basel Council, which took place between 1431 and 1449,
during the Western schism, engraving, 1730.
This year has been a difficult one for many, with a multitude of significant events unfolding. From the rise of the Millennial and Snowflake Generations to the ongoing challenges posed by Brexit, the looming crash of the stock market, and rumours of World War 3, the world seems increasingly chaotic. The tensions across the European Union have intensified, and governments are legislating against the use of certain words. Anti-feminist propaganda has risen, coinciding with political efforts to further remove Judeo-Christian values from mainstream education. These efforts coincide with a broader rejection of centuries-old conservative beliefs, replaced by a growing political sympathy for socialist and communist ideas. This is creating widening divisions in society, contributing to civil unrest. There is widespread corruption within European and UK governments, and, to sum up the current climate, we could aptly say that the fall of Babylon the Great is upon us.
The Fall of Babylon
The term Babylon the Great is often used symbolically in biblical literature, particularly in the Book of Revelation, to describe a time of confusion and chaos. The concept is a metaphor for political, religious, and social disintegration. In this context, the phrase Babylon the Great aptly describes the current state of affairs, where truth is obscured, and many are left in confusion regarding the moral, political, and spiritual direction of society.
Whilst the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is seen by some as winning its counter-reformation agenda, there are still significant struggles within the Christian world, particularly in relation to doctrines and practices. One of the most contentious issues is the celebration of Christmas, which some see as undermining the gospel message. The question arises: are we at the end of an era for apologetics and polemics, with doctrinal purity being disregarded in favour of divisive arguments?
Doctrinal Struggles in Christianity
The eschatological divide—the divide concerning teachings about the end times—has led to schisms and arguments within churches. Predictions about the building of a third temple in Jerusalem, for example, have led to the rise of false prophecies and an overemphasis on end-time speculation. This focus on the future has diverted attention from the core of the Christian message: salvation through Christ.
The rise of false doctrines, especially concerning the timing of Christ’s return, has sparked heated debates. However, regardless of one’s political or theological views, it is undeniable that we are living in a period of great confusion, often exacerbated by the phenomenon of fake news and media manipulation.
In these times of uncertainty, the Church must be cautious in remaining faithful to the gospel. The purity of doctrine, once regarded as paramount, seems to be increasingly compromised by distractions and unbiblical teachings.
The Crisis of Moral Integrity
A significant concern this year has been the failure of Christian ministries, such as Moriel Ministries, to publicly condemn abuses within certain Christian institutions. While Moriel has spoken out against sexual abuse within the RCC, it has remained silent on similar abuses within evangelical circles, such as those in Calvary Chapel and New Tribes Mission (NTM).
These institutions have been exposed in the media for their role in enabling child abuse, and yet Moriel has not issued any public statements condemning these actions. This silence is concerning, as it signals a reluctance to hold evangelical leaders accountable for their actions. While NTM and Calvary Chapel have taken steps to address these issues, the initial failures to prevent abuse cannot be overlooked.
It is essential for Moriel, as a Christian ministry, to take a stand against abuse wherever it occurs, not just within the RCC but also within evangelical circles. The Church has a responsibility to speak out against injustice and uphold the dignity of all people, particularly the most vulnerable—children.
The Need for Accountability
One of the major issues with Moriel Ministries is its lack of transparency and accountability. As a public ministry, it is unclear who Moriel is ultimately accountable to. This lack of clarity makes it difficult for concerned individuals to approach the ministry with their concerns, leading to a sense of frustration and helplessness.
Jacob Prasch and Moriel Ministries must acknowledge their responsibility to speak out on public platforms with humility and integrity. While they may not be directly responsible for the actions of others, they do bear a responsibility to confront issues of injustice and wrongdoing within the Church. Silence in the face of such issues is not an option, and it is my hope that Moriel will take this call for accountability seriously.
The Christmas Debate
The debate surrounding the celebration of Christmas continues to be a source of division within the Church. Some argue that the origins of Christmas are rooted in pagan traditions, while others defend its Christian significance. Daniel Lattier, in his 2017 article The Myth of the Pagan Origins of Christmas, attempts to refute the idea that Christmas has pagan roots, but his argument is flawed.
Lattier contends that the celebration of Christmas does not fundamentally undermine the gospel. However, the Christmas narrative, rooted in Catholic dogma, presents a distorted view of Christ’s redemptive sacrifice. The Christmas story, when viewed through the lens of Catholic tradition, becomes a celebration of the Eucharist rather than a pure focus on Christ’s work of salvation on the cross.
It is important to understand that the date of December 25th, chosen by Pope Julius I, was not co-opted from pagan traditions but was deliberately established to draw pagans into the Catholic fold. This ecumenical exercise was part of a broader effort to unite all peoples under the authority of the RCC, and to reject the gospel’s purity in favour of a more syncretic, watered-down version of Christianity.
The Gospel vs. Catholic Dogma
The core issue with Christmas as it is traditionally celebrated is not its pagan origins but its grounding in Catholic dogma. By observing Christmas in the traditional sense, many Christians inadvertently lend legitimacy to the RCC’s teachings, which undermine the gospel. The Christmas feast, as a celebration of Christ’s birth, often fails to centre on Christ’s redemptive work. Instead, it reinforces the RCC’s teachings on the Eucharist, the Mass, and the sacraments.
Michael Voris, a staunch defender of the RCC, accurately describes the celebrations surrounding Christmas as being deeply Catholic in nature, with all the associated rituals and festivities. This is a key point: Christmas, as celebrated by many Christians, has become a tool of Catholic ecumenism, promoting unity with Rome at the cost of doctrinal purity.
The Impact of Secularism and Extreme Ideologies
In recent years, we have witnessed the rise of extremist ideologies, including militant veganism and a further push to dismantle traditional institutions like marriage. These developments are signs of a growing cultural shift that prioritises political correctness and social activism over traditional moral values.
Despite these troubling trends, we can take comfort in the fact that God is sovereign and His plan will unfold according to His will. The events of each year serve a greater purpose in fulfilling God’s eternal plan. As Christians, we can face the future with hope, knowing that Christ’s return is imminent, even as we wait patiently for His arrival.
Conclusion: Keeping Our Focus on Christ
In the midst of these challenges, it is crucial that we, as Christians, do not lose sight of our hope in Christ. The events of the last days, as described in passages like Matthew 24:6, can be frightening, but they remind us that our strength comes from God. Our hope is not rooted in speculation about the timing of Christ’s return—whether pre, mid, or post-tribulation—but in the gospel itself.
The true message of Christmas, and of the entire Christian faith, is the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. Let us not be distracted by secondary issues or speculative doctrines but remain steadfast in the hope of the gospel. As we navigate the confusion of these times, let us hold fast to the truths of Scripture and keep our eyes fixed on Christ.
God bless you
Miguel Hayworth 30/12/2019
The post End Year Review 2018 appeared first on UK Apologetics Library.