The Tech Lash That Wasn't | Check-In 67

"In this ChatEDU Check-In: The Techlash That Wasn't, Matt explores how states actually reacted to the big tech backlash of 2026." Despite media headlines depicting a widespread removal of classroom technology, actual state policy decisions have taken a far more restrained approach. Enacted state laws generally avoid sweeping bans and instead implement moderate, targeted guardrails. Key Takeaways: State policy outcomes in 2026 reflect restrained regulatory measures rather than total tech bans. Legislation focused restrictions primarily on younger grade levels while protecting targeted learning tools and high-impact interventions. Regulatory decisions are outpacing current academic research on how digital tools and AI affect student learning across different contexts. Matt’s Two Cents: Rather than waiting for clear signals from academic research or reacting to alarmist public headlines, school leaders must proactively collect and analyze local data. By synthesizing survey feedback, curriculum goals, and real-world classroom audits, districts can make informed decisions about where to lean into technology and where to scale back. Article: How States Actually Responded to the Ed Tech Backlash of 2026 https://tinyurl.com/3rbwzxcm