Government Shrinkflation: We're Paying More and Getting Less | Wacky Wednesday
OCT 22, 202653 MIN
/https://files.flightcast.com/v3-imports/images/m2bji5k1abum6jvmzsgxp06d/sxx90ifcppk26xmyi5f5ogk7-cover.jpg)
Description
Text the show!
๐ธ MORE TAXES. LESS SERVICE. WHO'S GETTING THE MONEY?
America has a government shrinkflation problem. We're paying more in taxes while schools, public safety, and essential government services struggle to deliver what taxpayers are paying for.
And tonight, we're following the money.
In this Wacky Wednesday episode of Common Sense with Chad Law, we're examining how public employee unions, political endorsements, collective bargaining agreements, and decades of pension promises can create a system where politicians negotiate with the very organizations that helped elect them.
Nearly 90 years ago, Franklin D. Roosevelt warned that collective bargaining couldn't simply be transplanted into government employment. Ronald Reagan echoed that distinction decades later.
Maybe they understood something we've forgotten.
๐ TONIGHT'S BREAKDOWN:
๐๏ธ FDR's warning about government unions and the taxpayer's seat at the negotiating table.
๐ฐ How union endorsements, election calendars, and government contracts intersect.
๐ Why California's firefighters and highway patrol officers illustrate the difference between rewarding performance and rewarding seniority.
๐ How pension promises consume money that could otherwise fund current services.
๐ซ California, Oregon, and Chicago: rising education costs, shrinking enrollment, and disappointing student outcomes.
๐ฅ The Los Angeles fire department budget debate and the difference between funding employees and funding operational capacity.
โ
Two possible reforms for putting taxpayers back at the negotiating table.
This isn't an argument against teachers, police officers, firefighters, or fair pay. My mother was a union teacher, and her paycheck helped put food on our family's table.
It's an argument for paying people well, measuring results, and making sure the public gets what it pays for.
Because the employer isn't the governor. As FDR put it, the employer is the whole people.
And that's us.
โฑ๏ธ CHAPTERS
00:00 Shrinkflation in Government Services
02:33 FDR's Warning on Collective Bargaining
06:52 The Cycle of Endorsements and Contracts
13:09 Research on Union Influence and Public Spending
13:58 The Impact of Election Timing on Public Spending
14:40 Negotiating Pay for Firefighters: A Case Study
17:23 The Disconnect Between Pay and Performance
20:55 The Role of Unions in Political Negotiations
24:14 Public Contracts and Seniority: A Flawed System
26:17 California Highway Patrol: Automatic Pay Increases
29:16 The Consequences of Pension Promises
35:55 California's Rising Pension Costs
37:20 Education Spending vs. Student Performance
39:35 The Impact of Union Contracts on Education
41:45 Budget Mismanagement in Chicago Schools
44:07 Fire Department Funding and Accountability
47:15 Portland's Education Crisis and Union Challenges
49:35 The Need for Accountability in Public Services
๐ฒ JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Should a politician negotiate a government union contract with a union that endorsed their campaign?
Text me: 252-CHAD-LAW
๐ WEBSITE, BOOKS & MORE
https://chadparkerlaw.com
๐ฐ THE GAILY NEWS
Get the stories that matter, vetted and verified, twice daily. Subscribe free at chadparkerlaw.com.
๐บ COMMON SENSE WITH CHAD LAW
New episodes at 7 PM Pacific.
Understand more. Fear less. Laugh more.
#GovernmentShrinkflation #GovernmentUnions #PublicEmployeeUnions #GovernmentSpending #TaxpayerAccountability #ChadLaw #CommonSense #WackyWednesday #CaliforniaPolitics #OregonPolitics #PensionCrisis #EducationReform


/https://files.flightcast.com/workspaces/o57468vmar7pvb1hqcss7inm/podcasts/m2bji5k1abum6jvmzsgxp06d/j9xmc9gfeobduzje2n9b0rhf.jpg)