/https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/2070368/2070368-1599669535061-8853bfba8f7d8.jpg)
#dobetter Pod
Megan Miller & Joe Smith
Do Better Pod Live - August 2025, What Keeps us Up at Night?
SEP 15, 202558 MIN
/https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/2070368/2070368-1599669535061-8853bfba8f7d8.jpg)
Description
Join Dr. Megan and Special Guest, Nicole Parks, as they discuss the topics keeping them at a night in the field of behavior analysis.
Meeting Purpose
To discuss current issues keeping behavior analysts "up at night" and explore potential solutions in the field of ABA.
Key Takeaways
Licensure requirements for behavior analysts across states are inconsistent and often unclear, causing confusion and challenges for practitioners.
RBT turnover remains a significant issue in ABA, with no clear solutions despite ongoing discussions and attempts to improve company culture.
There's a growing divide between academic and practitioner expertise in the field, leading to debates about the definition of an "expert" in ABA.
State Licensure Challenges
Inconsistent interpretation of licensure requirements across states
Lack of clear guidance from regulatory boards on specific situations (e.g., providing supervision across state lines)
Need for a comprehensive resource outlining state-by-state licensure requirements
Challenges with reciprocal licensing and the cost/time involved in obtaining multiple state licenses
RBT Turnover and Retention
Ongoing issue with high turnover rates among Registered Behavior Technicians (RBTs)
Difficulty balancing professional expectations with entry-level position realities
Challenges in creating a sustainable business model while providing adequate support and growth opportunities for RBTs
Need for better screening tools to identify candidates well-suited for the unique demands of RBT positions
Defining Expertise in ABA
Growing divide between academic and practitioner perspectives on expertise
Recent publications emphasizing journal articles and academic credentials as primary indicators of expertise
Practitioners feeling undervalued despite extensive real-world experience
Need for a more inclusive definition of expertise that recognizes both academic and practical contributions to the field

