/https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.buzzsprout.com%2Ffxmycou59dqtazjhqi4t325b5pj0%3F.jpg)
Freedom of Thought by Humanists International
Humanise Live
How Humanists International Makes Decisions At The Global Level - Guide to the General Assembly
AUG 5, 202637 MIN
/https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.buzzsprout.com%2Fvqh8vndlvx0grjvsike61fel7p45%3F.jpg)
Description
Sign up for the Humanists International Newsletter
https://humanists.international/sign-up-for-the-newsletter/
With less than a week to go before the World Humanist Congress in Ottawa, Gary McLelland and Leon Langdon step back from interviews to do something different: build an evergreen guide to how Humanists International's General Assembly actually works. The idea came from a board meeting where HI decided to use the podcast to create resources that will remain useful long after any particular news cycle. This episode is designed for delegates heading to Ottawa and for anyone joining the movement who wants to understand how a humanist voice becomes global humanist policy.
Slides for this episode are available here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10LEduM7jK97FkabbJduNOiyYBX3Ano2a/view?usp=sharing
In this episode we cover
Who makes up the General Assembly
The governance structure
GA timelines and submission: resolutions, motions, and board nominations
Emergency motion process
How a resolution becomes global policy
Safety mechanism and: quorum rules, emergency assemblies
Further reading and references
Humanists International General Assembly: https://humanists.international/about/our-members/general-assembly/
HI Member Organisations: https://humanists.international/about/our-members/
Follow Humanist International
Sign up for our free Newsletter
Support Humanists International
Follow our Campaigns
About - Humanists International
Freedom of Thought Report
This podcast is produced by Humanise Live.
Start your podcast today, visit: humanise.live
🎶Music: Horizon by Simon Folwar
Podcast transcripts are AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided to make our content more accessible, but should not be considered a fully accurate record of the conversation.

