Why Federal Rule 107 Matters for Your Trial Presentations | Episode 92

Modern juries expect high-quality courtroom visuals. While trial demonstratives are essential for conveying arguments and maintaining juror attention, evolving evidentiary standards are reshaping how these visuals are developed and used.  In this IMS Insights Podcast episode, Senior Director of Jury Consulting Chris Dominic welcomes Trial Consultant Michelle Cooper to examine Federal Rule of Evidence 107 and its direct implications for trial presentations. They explore how this rule influences expectations for demonstratives, including the distinction between illustrative visuals and those that may be admitted into evidence, and share practical tips for how trial teams can approach visual strategy with greater intention.  Listen now for insights on:  How Federal Rule 107 changes expectations for trial demonstratives  The distinction between illustrative visuals and admitted evidence  Why visual strategies should begin early in case development  How transparency, structure, and accuracy influence juror understanding  What a disciplined approach to trial visuals looks like in practice  Ideal for trial attorneys and litigation teams, this episode offers practical guidance on aligning visual strategy with changing evidentiary standards while supporting juror comprehension and decision-making.  Watch the original LinkedIn Live recording here.  Read Michelle Cooper’s article on Federal Rule 107: https://imslegal.com/articles/why-federal-rule-107-matters  Explore IMS trial graphics services today: https://imslegal.com/services/trial-graphics  IMS has delivered strategic litigation consulting and expert witness services to leading global law firms and Fortune 500 companies for more than 30 years, in more than 65,000 cases. IMS consultants become an extension of your legal team from pre-suit investigation services to discovery and then on to arbitration and trial. Learn more at imslegal.com.