/https://img.transistorcdn.com/3nh-QbnGiyC0kG4tQRWb4fTYyDh5wonK_KZjqlkFNSY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hYmEw/YmE3N2JmMDhmNjli/YTg2MjhlOTQ0OGU4/Yzg2OC5wbmc.jpg)
Normal Curves: Sexy Science, Serious Statistics
Regina Nuzzo and Kristin Sainani
Statistical Sleuthing: Can you spot a problem?
OCT 5, 202671 MIN
/https://img.transistorcdn.com/WMA0mPlCmurQdG4gxkrQ3Xoku7_8GGzVzm8EdnJ2waA/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:1400/h:1400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80ZGJk/YzAzZjY0NmM1MTY1/NjZjNGNhYjYyYTZk/NjRjNC5wbmc.jpg)
Description
Can you spot problems in a scientific study just by reading the published paper? We put our statistical sleuthing skills to the test with a famous study on procrastination and deadlines that was retracted more than 20 years after it was published. But were there clues hidden in plain sight in the published results—and would we have noticed anything suspicious at the time? We put on our data-detective hats and find a few statistical clues of our own before turning to Data Colada’s investigation of the original data, where the story gets even stranger. Along the way, we hunt for missing participants, question suspiciously enormous effects, meet some unlikely data twins, and discover why sometimes the best statistical tool is simply asking: Do these data behave like real people?
Statistical topics
Statistical sleuthing
Effect sizes
Degrees of freedom
Replication
Missing data
Methodologic Morals
“A data detective's toolbox is surprisingly simple. Check the degrees of freedom, look for twins, question giant effects, and ask whether the data actually make human sense.”
“You don't have to be a statistician to catch a statistical criminal.”
References
Data Colada blog posts:https://datacolada.org/138
https://datacolada.org/139
Data and code: https://researchbox.org/7135
Retraction Watch article: https://retractionwatch.com/2026/09/03/procrastination-study-duke-dan-ariely-psychological-science-data-colada-tampering-retraction/
Original 2002 paper: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9280.00441
Retraction notice: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976261488042
Hyndman K, Bisin A. Replication of "Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment". Psychol Sci. 2026;37(8):557-571. doi:10.1177/09567976261460772
Kristin and Regina’s online courses:
Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding
Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis
Medical Statistics Certificate Program
Writing in the Sciences
Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program
Program that Kristin teaches in::
Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program
Kristin’s manuscript writing course:
https://instats.org/seminar/from-data-to-discussion-writing-a-scient
Find us on:
Kristin - LinkedIn & Twitter/X
Regina - LinkedIn & ReginaNuzzo.com
(00:00) - Introduction
(02:15) - The Procrastination Paper and Study Two
(08:51) - Suspiciously Tidy Results
(16:18) - Study One: Real Classroom Stakes
(20:06) - Missing Data and First Red Flags
(28:17) - How Data Colada Got the Data
(33:43) - When the Replication Failed
(35:36) - Red Flags: Data Twins and Sanity Checks
(47:21) - Study One Gets the Spreadsheet Treatment
(51:45) - The Grading Scheme Unravels
(57:51) - Manuscript Versions Reveal the Truth
(01:08:11) - Rating the Claim and Methodological Morals

