PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast

In children with septic shock, does the choice between balanced crystalloids and 0.9% saline actually matter? This episode reviews the composition and physiologic differences between commonly used crystalloids, summarizes the 2026 PRoMPT BOLUS trial, and discusses how its findings fit with the updated Surviving Sepsis Campaign pediatric guidelines. We also consider the trial’s limitations and what the results mean for fluid selection at the bedside. Learning Objectives By the end of this episode, listeners should be able to: Compare the composition and physiologic effects of 0.9% saline and balanced crystalloids used for pediatric fluid resuscitation. Summarize the design and major findings of the PRoMPT BOLUS trial. Describe important limitations of PRoMPT BOLUS when applying its results to children with septic shock. Apply current evidence and 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations when selecting crystalloid fluids for pediatric septic shock. References Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Oczkowski SJW, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Children 2026. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2026. Published April 1, 2026.Jointly issued by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Recommendation 24 suggests balanced/buffered crystalloids over 0.9% saline for children with septic shock requiring fluid boluses (conditional recommendation, very low certainty), while recognizing 0.9% saline as a suitable alternative and preferred in selected situations such as hyponatremia or concern for increased intracranial pressure. Balamuth F, Weiss SL, Long E, et al. Balanced Fluid or 0.9% Saline in Children Treated for Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2026.Published April 24, 2026. PRoMPT BOLUS was a large pragmatic randomized trial comparing balanced crystalloids with 0.9% saline in children treated for suspected septic shock and found no reduction in major adverse kidney events within 30 days with balanced fluids. Transcript This transcript was generated using Descript and subsequently reviewed and lightly edited for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Minor inaccuracies may remain, and the audio recording should be considered the definitive version of this content. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I’m your host, Brad Sobolewski, and today we’re gonna talk about which fluid we should use when managing a septic pediatric patient. So when we resuscitate a child with septic shock, the major decision is usually not whether to give crystalloid, but which crystalloid to give. And for a long time, there’s been a gradual shift towards balanced fluids such as Lactated Ringer’s or Plasma-Lyte, largely because they are more physiologic and produce less hyperchloremia than normal saline. The question’s always been whether those biochemical differences actually translate into better clinical outcomes. That is the question that a study called PRoMPT BOLUS was designed to answer. So before getting into the trial, it’s worth briefly reviewing what these fluids actually contain. So normal saline is 0.9% sodium chloride. It contains one hundred and fifty-four milliequivalents per liter of sodium and a hundred and fifty-four milliequivalents per liter of chloride. The chloride concentration is substantially higher than plasma. Balanced crystalloids contain less chloride and have some other electrolytes and a buffer. Lactated Ringer’s contains approximately a hundred and thirty milliequivalents per liter of sodium, one hundred and nine of chloride, four of potassium, a small amount of calcium, and lactate as a buffer. Plasma-Lyte contains approximately one hundred and forty of sodium, ninety-eight of chloride, five of potassium, magnesium, and acetate and gluconate as buffers. The concern with normal saline is that the large chloride loads can produce hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. There’s also been concern about ad

Embedded earrings are a common pediatric emergency department presentation that can usually be managed quickly and safely without procedural sedation. This episode reviews why earrings become embedded, how to distinguish uncomplicated earlobe cases from higher-risk cartilage piercings, step-by-step removal techniques, pain control strategies, and appropriate wound care, antibiotics, and follow-up. Learning Objectives Recognize the evaluation and management of embedded earlobe earrings, including indications for local anesthesia, incision, and removal techniques. Differentiate uncomplicated earlobe piercings from cartilage piercings that require additional concern for perichondritis, Pseudomonas infection, and possible ENT consultation. Apply evidence-based post-procedure care, including appropriate wound management, antibiotic selection, and counseling to help prevent future embedded earrings. References Timm N, Iyer S. Embedded earrings in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(1):21-24. Muntz HR, Pa-C DJ, Asher BF. Embedded earrings: a complication of the ear-piercing gun. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;19(1):73-76. Kim MM, Goldman RD. Ear-piercing complications in children and adolescents. Can Fam Physician. 2022;68(9):661-663. Transcript This transcript was generated using Descript and subsequently reviewed and lightly edited for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Minor inaccuracies may remain, and the audio recording should be considered the definitive version of this content. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I’m your host, Brad Sobolewski. Today, we’re continuing our new series on minor procedures. These are the procedures we perform all the time in pediatric emergency departments. They’re not the subject of giant multicenter trials or big keynote lectures, but they are the procedures that families remember. If you make them quick, comfortable, and maybe even a little less scary, families and patients will remember that. And if the procedure turns into a wrestling match with three people trying to hold down a screaming child while you’re searching for an earring backing, they’re gonna remember that too. Today’s topic is embedded earrings. A kid walks into the emergency department holding one ear. The earlobe is swollen and red, and the parent says, “I can’t find their earring.” It didn’t disappear. The ear basically swallowed it, and the parents almost always feel bad. They think they did something wrong or they waited too long. Honestly, this happens all the time. The first one can be a little intimidating because the hardware isn’t always where you expect it to be, but after you’ve removed a few of these, you’ll realize they’re actually pretty straightforward. Most can be managed right in the emergency department or a well-resourced urgent care. One of the best studies on the topic actually came from Cincinnati Children’s. Tim and Iyer reviewed over 100 children who presented to our emergency department with embedded earrings over about a four-and-a-half-year period. The median age was eight years, and about 60% of the children were younger than 10. That fits with most of our clinical experience. Younger children are more likely to sleep on new piercings, play with their earrings, forget the aftercare instructions, or simply not notice that the backing has become too tight. Nearly 90% of embedded earrings involve the earlobe rather than the cartilage, and in about two-thirds of patients, it wasn’t the decorative front of the earring that got stuck, it was the posterior backing or clasp. That’s helpful because I, um, almost always start looking on the back of the ear, ‘cause usually they’ve taken off the front. About one-third of children had evidence of a localized infection when they presented. Usually, that meant tenderness, erythema, swelling, and maybe a little purulent drainage or crusting around the piercing. Doesn’t necessarily mean they need oral or

Cyclospora is an uncommon but important cause of prolonged watery diarrhea in children, particularly during the summer months and during foodborne outbreaks. This episode reviews the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic pitfalls, treatment, and practical emergency department approach to recognizing and managing pediatric cyclosporiasis. Learning Objectives Recognize the clinical features and epidemiology of Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in children, including when to suspect the diagnosis in patients with prolonged watery diarrhea. Select appropriate diagnostic testing for cyclosporiasis and identify the limitations of routine stool cultures, ova and parasite examinations, and gastrointestinal pathogen panels. Apply evidence-based treatment and supportive care for pediatric cyclospora infection, including appropriate antimicrobial therapy, hydration, and follow-up considerations. References Stobbe M. Outbreak of diarrhea-causing parasite grows to more than 1,000 cases. ABC News. Published July 8, 2026. Accessed July 10, 2026. Bilung LM, Tahar AS, Yunos NE, et al. Detection of Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora oocysts from environmental water for drinking and recreational activities in Sarawak, Malaysia. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4636420. doi:10.1155/2017/4636420. Giangaspero A, Gasser RB. Human cyclosporiasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(7):e226-e236. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30789-8. Pyzocha N, Cuda A. Common intestinal parasites. Am Fam Physician. 2023;108(5):487-493. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical care of cyclosporiasis. Updated March 8, 2024. Accessed July 10, 2026. Transcript This transcript was generated using Descript and subsequently reviewed and lightly edited for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Minor inaccuracies may remain, and the audio recording should be considered the definitive version of this content. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I’m your host, Brad Sobolewski. It’s July and a seven-year-old comes into your emergency department with 10 days of watery diarrhea. They were seen earlier in the week and told it was probably viral gastroenteritis. Maybe they got a prescription for ondansetron, maybe they didn’t. Stool cultures have already come back negative. Mom tells you, “Every time I think he’s finally getting better, the explosive diarrhea comes right back.” So what’s going on? Today we’re talking about Cyclospora. Honestly, it’s one of those organisms that most of us forget about until summer rolls around, or since medical school. We don’t diagnose it every week, and depending on where you practice, you may go years without seeing a case. But then an outbreak happens, and maybe just a handful of sporadic cases show up, and suddenly you’re reminded that not every child with prolonged diarrhea has viral gastroenteritis. Cyclospora cayetanensis is a coccidian protozoan that’s transmitted through contaminated food or water. In the United States, it’s most commonly associated with imported fresh produce, things like cilantro, basil, lettuce, salad mixes, and berries. Unlike bacterial food poisoning, everyone at the picnic usually isn’t sick, so it often presents as an isolated illness because the exposure happened days earlier and may have involved only one particular food item. Families are often trying to remember the one thing that they ate that made everybody sick. Honestly, sometimes it’s simply the salad they bought at the grocery store a week ago. One thing that’s helped me remember these organisms over the years is that they each sort of develop their own personality. You know, it’s often confused with Giardia and Cryptosporidium. So if the diarrhea is greasy, think Giardia. If it’s profuse, watery diarrhea after swimming, think Cryptosporidium. If it’s prolonged, watery diarrhea during the summer, think Cyclospora. Now, obviously there are exceptions, but I think that’s a pretty useful framework,

Fishhook injuries are common, surprisingly nuanced, and honestly a little intimidating until you’ve removed a few. In this first episode of our Minor Procedures series, we’ll reel in the essentials of pediatric fishhook removal, helping you take the bait on four classic removal techniques, procedural planning, anesthesia strategies, and post-removal management. We’ll discuss when to pull back, when to advance, when not to get hooked on a single technique, and how to avoid turning a simple procedure into the one that got away. Along the way we’ll cover sedation, antibiotics, wound care, and practical pearls to help you land these cases with confidence. Learning Objectives Compare and select among the four major fishhook removal techniques based on hook characteristics, depth of penetration, and anatomic location. Apply evidence-based approaches to analgesia, anxiolysis, procedural sedation, and post-removal management for pediatric fishhook injuries. Identify situations requiring escalation of care, including ocular involvement, contaminated water exposure, tendon or joint involvement, and circumstances where routine management may not be sufficient. References Gammons MG, Jackson E. Fishhook removal. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(11):2231-2236. Prats M, O'Connell M, Wellock A, Kman NE. Fishhook removal: case reports and a review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(6):e375-e380. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.058 Doser C, Cooper WL, Ediger WM, et al. Fishhook injuries: a prospective evaluation. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9(5):413-415. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(91)90204-w Transcript This episode used an AI-generated transcript created in Descript as an initial draft. The transcript was subsequently edited, expanded, and refined by the author with assistance from OpenAI’s ChatGPT (GPT-5.5). Final editorial decisions and content responsibility remain with the author. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I'm your host, Brad Sobolewski, and today we're gonna start a new series on minor procedures. These are the types of procedures that we perform all the time in the emergency department. They're not the subject of multicenter trials or big keynote lectures, but these are the things that patients and families remember, and trust me, they will remember them whether you do them well or not. First up, fishhook removal. So I'm hoping to reel in some listeners with this one, and so hopefully you'll take the bait, and by the end of this episode you'll understand exactly what angle I'm coming from. And hopefully I'm just not trying to make a bass of myself. So anyway, fishhook removal sounds really simple until you actually start doing it. There's not just one technique. There are four classic approaches, and I'll talk about them all, and which one you choose depends on the hook, whether there's a barb, how deep it is, where it's located, your personal experience with different techniques. Fishhook injuries in children are usually minor and most commonly involve the hands and head, though I've seen them stuck in other body parts as well. Most can be managed in the emergency department or urgent care setting with local anesthesia and basic equipment Of course, if there's concern for tendon involvement, joint penetration, neurovascular compromise, if it's anywhere near the eyeball, you should stop and rethink your plan. You know, so ortho, if it's embedded deeply in a joint, um, anything that involves the eye itself isn't necessarily an emergency department procedure, and I'm not talking about the eyebrow, I'm talking about the globe. Fortunately, that's very rare, but that's definitely an ophthalmology conversation. And so before you even think about removing, you need to understand the hook. Is this a single hook or is this a treble hook? A treble hook is a type of fishing hook that has three individual hooks and barbs arranged in a triangular formation, and they're all fused to a single

Croup is a clinical syndrome of upper airway obstruction defined by barking cough, stridor, and hoarseness. Management hinges on severity assessment, universal corticosteroid use, and selective epinephrine. The key clinical task is distinguishing typical croup from high-risk mimics that require urgent airway intervention. Learning Objectives Differentiate croup from other causes of pediatric upper airway obstruction using key historical and physical exam features. Apply a severity-based approach to croup management, including appropriate use of corticosteroids and nebulized epinephrine. Recognize clinical features that suggest alternative or life-threatening diagnoses requiring escalation of care. References Cooke A, Conway S, Griffin L. Croup: Rapid Evidence Review. Am Fam Physician. 2026;113(3):254-258. Gates A, Johnson DW, Klassen TP. Glucocorticoids for Croup in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(6):595-596. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0834 Bjornson CL, Klassen TP, Williamson J, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Single Dose of Oral Dexamethasone for Mild Croup. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1306-1313. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa033534 Bjornson CL, Johnson DW. Croup. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):329-339. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60170-1 Bjornson C, Russell K, Vandermeer B, Klassen TP, Johnson DW. Nebulized Epinephrine for Croup in Children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD006619. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006619.pub3 Transcript This transcript was generated using Descript and subsequently reviewed and lightly edited for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Minor inaccuracies may remain, and the audio recording should be considered the definitive version of this content. Welcome to PEM Currents: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcast. As always, I’m your host, Brad Sobolewski. And today we’re gonna talk about croup. We’re gonna focus on diagnosis, severity based management, and how to differentiate it from scarier high risk conditions that may present similarly, but behave very differently. So croup is best understood as a clinical syndrome of upper airway obstruction caused by inflammation at the level of the larynx and subglottis. So in most cases this is viral laryngotracheitis, most commonly due to parainfluenza virus. But as you’d expect multiple viruses can cause it. The subglottis is the narrowest portion of the pediatric airway. So even small amounts of edema create large increases in airway resistance. So that’s why the clinical picture is so consistent. You’ve got inspiratory stridor, hoarseness, and that characteristic barking cough, which either sounds like a seal or a dog, and yes, of course, I know the difference between the two coughs because I was a biology major. This is primarily a disease of children between six months and three years of age with a peak incidence in the second year of life. It’s really, really common, like one and a half percent of all ED visits, maybe 350,000 visits a year, and 85% of these kids have mild disease. Hospitalization is rare. The range is variable, about two to 8% of cases, and return visits occur in about three to 5%. Fewer than 1% of children, a lot fewer, require intensive care or airway intervention. Honestly, most kids do really well. The ones who don’t can get sick very quickly, and that’s been my clinical experience. In the Northern Hemisphere, we see croup throughout the fall and winter, usually starting in around November and sort of tapering off by April. But that being said, I’ve seen croup-like symptoms every month of the year over the past couple of decades. Croup is absolutely a classic clinical diagnosis. A typical case begins with 12 to 48 hours of viral prodrome, you know, body aches, fever, congestion, cough, followed by often abrupt nighttime onset of barky cough and stridor. Symptoms fluctuate, and they’re generally worse with agitation and get better when the kid is calm. That variability is the key feature. So what you’ll have is a child who wakes up af