/https://files.flightcast.com/workspaces/l1254uknm6c9795b6uo2x9vn/podcasts/affjdjmwgskoi2zmjg1w9a21/kvoshyc04tx9t2gflzonv5jp.jpg)
Technically Creative by KoobrikLabs
Orlando Wood
Advertising is Eating Itself; Week in Review Sept 14th, 2026
SEP 14, 202618 MIN
/https://files.flightcast.com/workspaces/l1254uknm6c9795b6uo2x9vn/01M2E5A9DD1325686AH21YR13M/weekinreview_09_14_2026.jpg)
Description
Weekly AI news for the creative industries. This week, Technically Creative looks at the growing fight over who gets to make advertising, how AI is disappearing into professional creative workflows, and why the rules around technology, work and authorship are changing faster than the institutions around them.
The biggest story is advertising production.
WPP is pushing more commercial production through its own 10,000-person production operation, challenging the traditional triple-bid system that has long connected agencies, clients and independent production companies. With traditional agency revenues under pressure, production growing, clients demanding exponentially more content and generative AI making internal production increasingly viable, this may be less about one controversial procurement policy and more about the future structure of the entire advertising industry.
We also look at Omnicom, IPG and the extraordinary movement of major client accounts across the holding companies, including PepsiCo’s reported $1.7 billion shift of media, data and technology business.
Then there’s Adobe, which is embedding generative video and audio directly inside Premiere rather than asking professional creatives to abandon their existing workflows. Adobe also reported record quarterly revenue, providing an interesting signal that putting AI inside the tools people already use may be a more powerful strategy than simply launching another model.
Reuters and ITN are using AI to make more than 70 years of historic broadcast footage easier to find and license, showing how AI can create value from existing human work rather than replacing it.
And finally, the AI safety debate gets considerably more uncomfortable. OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring investment-grade credit ratings while current and former AI researchers publicly warn about potentially catastrophic risks from frontier models. When even some of the people building the technology are calling for slower development and stronger governance, the obvious question becomes: when should government actually step in?
The thread connecting all of it is that technology doesn’t just change what we can do. It changes the agreements around who does the work, who owns the opportunity, where talent goes, and what rules everybody is expected to follow.
And right now, those contracts are being rewritten very quickly.

