/https://artwork.captivate.fm/7726185b-570f-4d94-a795-4ca3bab3e3ac/Graphics.jpg)
Cross-Examined
The Law Institute of Victoria
Lawyers and AML/CTF enforcement: Two decades of lessons from the UK
13 TEM, 202624 DAK
/https://artwork.captivate.fm/31fb7c73-3538-47f8-86f6-ef7a3ec9ee44/20260623-DIG-PUBS-Podcast-AMLseries-Captivate-EP3-V01.jpg)
Bölüm Hakkında
Episode Summary:
Most AML/CTF enforcement action against lawyers does not stem from deliberate wrongdoing, but small everyday decisions that go unchallenged and unchecked. This episode explores UK enforcement cases to show how Australian practitioners can recognise risk earlier, strengthen compliance and avoid the mistakes of their UK counterparts.
Guest:
Dr Katie Benson, Senior Lecturer in Criminology, University of Manchester
Associate Fellow, RUSI Centre for Finance and Security, with a background in UK law enforcement
Expert in the role of lawyers in facilitating illicit finance and regulatory responses
www.linkedin.com/in/katie-benson-b36029a4/ | research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/katie.benson
Host:
Artemis Evangelidis, Law Institute of Victoria
[email protected] | www.linkedin.com/company/law-institute-of-victoria
Episode Overview:
Drawing on UK’s AML/CTF enforcement cases against lawyers, this episode examines how the decisions and actions in day-to-day legal practice can lead to serious legal consequences. It highlights key risk areas, including client account compliance, property transactions and source of funds due diligence. Dr Katie Benson brings a research-driven perspective, grounded in case analysis and industry interviews, to explain how situational pressures and organisational context shape decision making. For lawyers preparing for AML/CTF compliance Australia, this episode provides practical guidance on identifying early warning signs, avoiding complacency and strengthening firm-wide risk management practices.
Topics & Timestamps:
00:04 Intro and AML reforms context
01:02 Types of AML enforcement cases involving lawyers
03:00 Criminal and regulatory pathways
05:00 High-risk areas including property and client accounts
09:27 Differences in culpability and enforcement outcomes
14:58 Red flags and suspicious client behaviour
19:45 Practical guidance for Australian lawyers
23:31 Final reflections on risk and accountability
Key Takeaways:
AML/CTF enforcement action against lawyers in the UK does not often stem from deliberate misconduct
UK cases show client accounts and property transactions are consistent high-risk areas
Source of funds and source of wealth checks are critical and increasingly scrutinised
Demonstrating active compliance, not just policies on paper, is essential[IF1]
Situational pressures and firm culture influence how lawyers respond to risk
Early intervention and questioning client narratives can prevent escalation
Compliance must be embedded across the firm, not left to individuals
Resources & Links:
LIV AML/CTF Hub – Central resource for Tranche 2 readiness and compliance guidance | www.liv.asn.au/amlhub
LIV Compliance and Professional Standards – Practical guidance on regulatory obligations for lawyers | www.liv.asn.au/compliance
SRA AML Annual Report – UK enforcement trends and insights into compliance failures | www.sra.org.uk/sra/research-publications/aml-annual-report-2023-24/
University of Manchester profile – Dr Katie Benson – Research overview and publications | research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/katie.benson
AUSTRAC AML/CTF guidance – Australian regulatory framework and expectations | www.austrac.gov.au
Dr Katie Benson’s 2020 book, Lawyers and the Proceeds of Crime
From money laundering to illicit finance – Comparative research on evolving AML regulation in the UK and Australia (2025) | www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10345329.2024.2443702#abstract
Complementarity, tension and proportionality in the anti-money laundering regulation of law firm client accounts (2026) | link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-025-10252-3
Occupation, organisation, opportunity and oversight: law firm client accounts and (anti-)money laundering (2024) | link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10610-024-09581-1
About This Podcast:
Cross-Examined is a new podcast from the Law Institute of Victoria. Tune in to hear experts discuss hot topics in the law and the changes shaping the legal profession. Regular episodes will cover everything from AI and cyber threats to ethical dilemmas, workplace taboos and practice management insights.
This podcast is recorded on the traditional lands of the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin Nation. The Law Institute of Victoria acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country across Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.
Disclaimer:
This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional legal advice. The views expressed in this podcast do not necessarily reflect the views of the Law Institute of Victoria (LIV). The LIV is not responsible for any losses, damages or liabilities that may arise from the use of this podcast. Listeners should seek independent legal advice for their matters.
Production Information:
Produced by: The Law Institute of Victoria
Producer and audio editor: Garreth Hanley
Music: Garreth Hanley
Copy and show notes: Louise Surette
Connect With Us:
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.liv.asn.au
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/law-institute-of-victoria
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/cross-examined/id1858765728
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/0zvyk5xia4wYv9YWcXphgV

