A liberal and voluntaryist discuss climate change, its possible causes and what humans should do about it. Although they don't agree on the cause, there is quite a bit they do agree on, including the general failure of the current political system, the impossibility of an utopian solution, needing to understand the problem before having adequate solutions, how asymmetrical power is a breeding ground for corruption, and more.
If humanity is facing an existential climate crisis, would you rather pass quietly into the night or survive to rebuild when the ashes settle? In this discussion with a special guest, my sister-in-law, discover where two people with very different views on politics, climate change, etc., fundamentally agree and disagree, how they'd prefer to face the end of humanity as we know it if they had the choice, and how much they like to say like.
