Making Sense From Hear

To what extent is a healing of intergenerational trauma needed in order to create a beautiful future? How does the psychological well-being of individuals inform the overall heath of a society? What's the general pattern of healing needed in order to properly relate to oneself and others? Is there reason for concern over the increased need for safe spaces and trigger warnings? Is humanity entering into a new way of being and if so what does it look like and how can we help being it into existence? If a chair stops squeaking in the middle of a podcast did it ever really make a sound?

To what extent do Allipathic and alternative forms of medicine fail to cure the root causes of disease? What are the root causes of disease? To what extent do we need to educate, advocate, and doctor ourselves to health? How can reconnecting to food production and the earth help our health? How can healing the soil heal the soul? To what extent does the external world and global plans for world domination serve as a distraction from inner self-awareness and liberation? How much does our inner states of being determine our external circumstances? What relationship does evil have with good? Is there an objective morality? What is the nature of reality? To what extent has the breakdown of the family unit led to the decline of american culture? How does subliminal messages impact the moral character of a generation? Is cryptocurrency part of an agenda or a real alternative to sound money? How on earth did I forget Francis Bacon's name?! All this and more on this randomly released episode of Making Sense From Hear

A liberal and voluntaryist discuss climate change, its possible causes and what humans should do about it. Although they don't agree on the cause, there is quite a bit they do agree on, including the general failure of the current political system, the impossibility of an utopian solution, needing to understand the problem before having adequate solutions, how asymmetrical power is a breeding ground for corruption, and more. If humanity is facing an existential climate crisis, would you rather pass quietly into the night or survive to rebuild when the ashes settle? In this discussion with a special guest, my sister-in-law, discover where two people with very different views on politics, climate change, etc., fundamentally agree and disagree, how they'd prefer to face the end of humanity as we know it if they had the choice, and how much they like to say like.

Are humans free or merely programmed by the society to which they belong? What relationship does technology play in how we relate to each other, the world and spirit? Is there an agenda guiding humanity towards a particular future? These questions and more are wrestled with in what is surely one of the least underrated podcast episodes in Making Sense from Hear's history - you're not going to want to miss it.

We recorded this episode a while ago and we couldn't fix some audio problems (one person on one ear piece and the other on the other while using headphones), and we couldn't edit my name drop, but I enjoyed this conversation so much I'm posting it anyways. Wish I wouldn't have gotten such little sleep the night before because I gassed out as the conversation was heading towards a fascinating problem of modern civilization, which I hope can be returned to in a later conversation: that of the question of land ownership and whether or not it must be mediated through the State. Hope you enjoy have as much as I did.