Scott Segal joins Taylor Stuart and Daniel Pope on the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor to unpack the sweeping impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” on the US energy sector. From policy changes and the future of electric vehicles, to rising energy demand from AI and data centers, the conversation highlights why a diverse energy mix is essential to powering America’s future.

<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott Segal joins Taylor Stuart and Daniel Pope on the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor to unpack the sweeping impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” on the US energy sector. From policy changes and the future of electric vehicles, to rising energy demand from AI and data centers, the conversation highlights why a diverse energy mix is essential to powering America’s future.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

Scott Segal joins Taylor Stuart and Daniel Pope on the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor to unpack the sweeping impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” on the US energy sector. From policy changes and the future of electric vehicles, to rising ene...

Energy, Permitting and Policy Shifts Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

In the latest episode of The Environmental Law Monitor, Bracewell’s <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/anouk-nouet/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Anouk Nouet </a>joins <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel Pope</a> to delve into the complexities of criminal negligence in environmental law. Using United States v. Hanousek and a major oil spill in Alaska as a case study, they unpack the legal intricacies and the unexpected outcome for Edward Hanousek, the roadmaster of the White Pass and Yukon Railroad, offering valuable insights into responsibilities and liabilities in environmental management.

<description>&lt;p&gt;In the latest episode of The Environmental Law Monitor, Bracewell’s &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/anouk-nouet/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Anouk Nouet &lt;/a&gt;joins &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Daniel Pope&lt;/a&gt; to delve into the complexities of criminal negligence in environmental law. Using &lt;em&gt;United States v. Hanousek&lt;/em&gt; and a major oil spill in Alaska as a case study, they unpack the legal intricacies and the unexpected outcome for Edward Hanousek, the roadmaster of the White Pass and Yukon Railroad, offering valuable insights into responsibilities and liabilities in environmental management.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

In the latest episode of The Environmental Law Monitor, Bracewell’s Anouk Nouet joins Daniel Pope to delve into the complexities of criminal negligence in environmental law. Using United States v. Hanousek and a major oil spill in Alaska as a case ...

An Environmental True Crime: Criminal Negligence Under the Clean Water Act

In the latest episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/ann-d-navaro/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ann Navaro</a> joins hosts <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel</a><a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pope</a> and <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Taylor Stuart</a> to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County. They delve into the ruling’s clarifications on judicial deference and an agency’s obligations under NEPA. The trio also examine the potential impacts on infrastructure projects in light of this decision.

<description>&lt;p&gt;In the latest episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/ann-d-navaro/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Ann Navaro&lt;/a&gt; joins hosts &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Daniel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Pope&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Taylor Stuart&lt;/a&gt; to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling &lt;em&gt;in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County&lt;/em&gt;. They delve into the ruling’s clarifications on judicial deference and an agency’s obligations under NEPA. The trio also examine the potential impacts on infrastructure projects in light of this decision.&lt;/p&gt;</description>

In the latest episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, Ann Navaro joins hosts DanielPope and Taylor Stuart to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County. They delve int...

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Momentous Decision on NEPA

On this episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/jeffrey-r-holmstead/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jeff Holmstead</a> joins <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel Pope</a> and <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Taylor Stuart </a>to discuss greenhouse gas regulations, the controversial endangerment finding and the future of environmental policy under the second Trump administration. They delve into the origins of the endangerment finding for greenhouse gases and explore its implications and the potential impact of current administration efforts to reconsider it.

<description>&lt;p&gt;On this episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/jeffrey-r-holmstead/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jeff Holmstead&lt;/a&gt; joins &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Daniel Pope&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Taylor Stuart &lt;/a&gt;to discuss greenhouse gas regulations, the controversial endangerment finding and the future of environmental policy under the second Trump administration. They delve into the origins of the endangerment finding for greenhouse gases and explore its implications and the potential impact of current administration efforts to reconsider it. &lt;/p&gt;</description>

On this episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, Jeff Holmstead joins Daniel Pope and Taylor Stuart to discuss greenhouse gas regulations, the controversial endangerment finding and the future of environmental policy under the second Tru...

Revisiting the Endangerment Finding: The Future of Greenhouse Gas Regulation

On this episode of the Environmental Law Monitor, <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel Pope</a> and <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Taylor Stuart</a> discuss the shifting landscape under the new Trump administration, comparing regulatory actions and priorities with those of previous administration, and delve into the complexities of NEPA regulations, endangered species and the impact of political changes on environmental legal practice. They explore how these transitions will affect legal practitioners and the energy sector and speculate on what to expect in the coming months.

<description>&lt;p&gt;On this episode of the Environmental Law Monitor, &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Daniel Pope&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Taylor Stuart&lt;/a&gt; discuss the shifting landscape under the new Trump administration, comparing regulatory actions and priorities with those of previous administration, and delve into the complexities of NEPA regulations, endangered species and the impact of political changes on environmental legal practice. They explore how these transitions will affect legal practitioners and the energy sector and speculate on what to expect in the coming months. &lt;/p&gt;</description>

On this episode of the Environmental Law Monitor, Daniel Pope and Taylor Stuart discuss the shifting landscape under the new Trump administration, comparing regulatory actions and priorities with those of previous administration, and delve into the...

Navigating the Shifts in Environmental Policy and Law Under the Trump Administration

Hosted by Daniel Pope and Taylor Stuart, the Environmental Law Monitor is a place for thoughtful conversations ranging from the latest developments to perennial topics like litigation, enforcement and compliance assurance

Environmental Law Monitor

Details

Recent Episodes