<p>In the latest episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/ann-d-navaro/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ann Navaro</a> joins hosts <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Daniel</a></p><p><a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/daniel-j-pope/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pope</a> and <a href="https://www.bracewell.com/people/taylor-m-stuart/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Taylor Stuart</a> to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling <em>in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County</em>. They delve into the ruling’s clarifications on judicial deference and an agency’s obligations under NEPA. The trio also examine the potential impacts on infrastructure projects in light of this decision.</p>

Environmental Law Monitor

[email protected] (Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor)

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Momentous Decision on NEPA

JUN 6, 202540 MIN
Environmental Law Monitor

Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Momentous Decision on NEPA

JUN 6, 202540 MIN

Description

In the latest episode of the Bracewell Environmental Law Monitor, Ann Navaro joins hosts DanielPope and Taylor Stuart to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County. They delve into the ruling’s clarifications on judicial deference and an agency’s obligations under NEPA. The trio also examine the potential impacts on infrastructure projects in light of this decision.