A certain kind of wealthy American has been griping out loud lately — about taxes, about progressive cities, about how unappreciated they are for the jobs they create, the stuff they buy, and the tips they hand out. A narrative is coalescing around them too: that the top 10% of earners now do so much of the spending, the U.S. economy relies on them. But an economy that depends so much on the people at the top isn't the healthy one the country deserves — it’s just wearing a nice suit.

Chapters:

00:00:56 Announcements: Q&A episode questions wanted
00:01:18 Retcon: The 86 debate; FDR's full "calamity howling executives" quote 00:05:32 Terms & Conditions: Wealth Effect and Zugzwang
00:09:26 Big Pilcrow: Should we cherish the ultra-wealthy?
00:36:41 Executive Orders: Retire "mummies"; union credits on red carpets 00:39:34 Spiritual Sponsors: Mellow Cello podcast; enormous floral arrangements

Further Reading

Moody's claim that the top 10% of earners now drive nearly half of consumer spending in the WSJ:
<a href="https://www.wsj.com/economy/consumers/us-economy-strength-rich-spending-2c34a571">https://www.wsj.com/economy/consumers/us-economy-strength-rich-spending-2c34a571</a>

The Minneapolis Fed on what the underlying data actually shows.<a href="https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2026/have-us-consumers-gone-k-shaped-a-review-of-the-data"> https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2026/have-us-consumers-gone-k-shaped-a-review-of-the-data</a>

Wealthy part-time New Yorkers reacting to a proposed pied-à-terre tax in the Financial Times.<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/3283eaab-e9cf-41e6-a028-5a02fb6f4615"> https://www.ft.com/content/3283eaab-e9cf-41e6-a028-5a02fb6f4615</a>

The Wall Street Journal on second-home taxes spreading from New York City to other states, including the San Diego homeowner who'd like to be cherished.<a href="https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/taxes-on-second-homes-are-springing-up-across-america-93a64448"> https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/taxes-on-second-homes-are-springing-up-across-america-93a64448</a>

Full reading list at https://optimisteconomy.substack.com

Donate to Optimist Economy: <a href="https://optimisteconomy.com">https://optimisteconomy.com</a>

Video-curious? Watch the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@optimist_economy">Optimist Economy YouTube channel⁠⁠</a>. We’re also on Instagram at ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.instagram.com/optimist_economy">@optimist_economy</a> or TikTok at ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@optimist_economy">@optimist_economy</a>. 
Chat with other Optimists on <a href="https://substack.com/chat/4604257?utm_source=pub-nav-bar">Substack.</a>

Find utility with our merch: <a href="https://merch.ambientinks.com/collections/optimisteconomy">https://merch.ambientinks.com/collections/optimisteconomy</a>

Got economic questions, concerns, or executive orders?  Send them to <a href="mailto:optimist.economy@gmail.com">optimist.economy@gmail.com</a>

Optimist Economy

Kathryn Anne Edwards and Robin Rauzi

Should We Cherish the Ultra-Wealthy? (a.k.a. ‘The Cornfield’)

MAY 26, 202642 MIN
Optimist Economy

Should We Cherish the Ultra-Wealthy? (a.k.a. ‘The Cornfield’)

MAY 26, 202642 MIN

Description

A certain kind of wealthy American has been griping out loud lately — about taxes, about progressive cities, about how unappreciated they are for the jobs they create, the stuff they buy, and the tips they hand out. A narrative is coalescing around them too: that the top 10% of earners now do so much of the spending, the U.S. economy relies on them. But an economy that depends so much on the people at the top isn't the healthy one the country deserves — it’s just wearing a nice suit.Chapters:00:00:56 Announcements: Q&A episode questions wanted 00:01:18 Retcon: The 86 debate; FDR's full "calamity howling executives" quote 00:05:32 Terms & Conditions: Wealth Effect and Zugzwang 00:09:26 Big Pilcrow: Should we cherish the ultra-wealthy?00:36:41 Executive Orders: Retire "mummies"; union credits on red carpets 00:39:34 Spiritual Sponsors: Mellow Cello podcast; enormous floral arrangementsFurther ReadingMoody's claim that the top 10% of earners now drive nearly half of consumer spending in the WSJ:https://www.wsj.com/economy/consumers/us-economy-strength-rich-spending-2c34a571The Minneapolis Fed on what the underlying data actually shows. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2026/have-us-consumers-gone-k-shaped-a-review-of-the-dataWealthy part-time New Yorkers reacting to a proposed pied-à-terre tax in the Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/3283eaab-e9cf-41e6-a028-5a02fb6f4615The Wall Street Journal on second-home taxes spreading from New York City to other states, including the San Diego homeowner who'd like to be cherished. https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/taxes-on-second-homes-are-springing-up-across-america-93a64448Full reading list at https://optimisteconomy.substack.com Donate to Optimist Economy: https://optimisteconomy.com Video-curious? Watch the Optimist Economy YouTube channel⁠⁠. We’re also on Instagram at ⁠⁠@optimist_economy or TikTok at ⁠⁠@optimist_economy.  Chat with other Optimists on Substack. Find utility with our merch: https://merch.ambientinks.com/collections/optimisteconomy Got economic questions, concerns, or executive orders?  Send them to [email protected]